From: | Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-alt] Prefix on a Gentoo host: sharing the Portage tree | ||
Date: | Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:04:44 | ||
Message-Id: | CAMxqorWFUWe981ZpmixQtvsvO=bKkBYZhJZ919L9EHyLcaXjcQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-alt] Prefix on a Gentoo host: sharing the Portage tree by Christoph Junghans |
1 | On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Christoph Junghans <ottxor@g.o> wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > Can you give us some motivating number how many packages still need to |
4 | > be back-ported to gx86? |
5 | |
6 | % pwd |
7 | .../prefix_trunk |
8 | % find . -maxdepth 2 -mindepth 2 -type d | wc -l |
9 | 338 |
10 | |
11 | So, roughly 338 packages are still in the prefix repo alone. That is |
12 | down ~30 in 5 months given my past analysis: |
13 | http://blog.jolexa.net/2012/02/gentoo-prefix-a-look-at-the-number-of-packages/ |
14 | So, at the current rate, we can expect the migration to take another |
15 | ~4.5 years. |
16 | -Jeremy |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-alt] Prefix on a Gentoo host: sharing the Portage tree | Christoph Junghans <ottxor@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-alt] Prefix on a Gentoo host: sharing the Portage tree | Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-alt] Prefix on a Gentoo host: sharing the Portage tree | Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-alt] Prefix on a Gentoo host: sharing the Portage tree | Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o> |