From: | Rob C <hyakuhei@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions | ||
Date: | Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:09:02 | ||
Message-Id: | f63a4d630704200006j716eeccalc4058edb0218d77f@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions by Christian Faulhammer |
1 | On 19/04/07, Christian Faulhammer <opfer@g.o> wrote: |
2 | > |
3 | > Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>: |
4 | > |
5 | > > On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES="collision-detect" by |
6 | > > default would do a lot more good at this stage than "test". |
7 | > |
8 | > Arch teams normally have collision-protect enabled when doing |
9 | > keywording/stabling....in my eyes this is sufficient. |
10 | > |
11 | > V-Li |
12 | > |
13 | > |
14 | Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a weekly |
15 | basis. So either this isn't sufficient or the arch teams are not acting as |
16 | you describe. |
17 | |
18 | -Rob |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions | Jakub Moc <jakub.moc@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions | "Alin Năstac" <mrness@g.o> |
[gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions | Christian Faulhammer <opfer@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions | Joshua Jackson <tsunam@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions | Matthias Langer <mlangc@×××.at> |