Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rob C <hyakuhei@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:09:02
Message-Id: f63a4d630704200006j716eeccalc4058edb0218d77f@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions by Christian Faulhammer
1 On 19/04/07, Christian Faulhammer <opfer@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>:
4 >
5 > > On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES="collision-detect" by
6 > > default would do a lot more good at this stage than "test".
7 >
8 > Arch teams normally have collision-protect enabled when doing
9 > keywording/stabling....in my eyes this is sufficient.
10 >
11 > V-Li
12 >
13 >
14 Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a weekly
15 basis. So either this isn't sufficient or the arch teams are not acting as
16 you describe.
17
18 -Rob

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions Jakub Moc <jakub.moc@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions "Alin Năstac" <mrness@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions Christian Faulhammer <opfer@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions Joshua Jackson <tsunam@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions Matthias Langer <mlangc@×××.at>