1 |
Alexis Ballier schrieb: |
2 |
> It would probably generate controversy indeed, but my comment was more |
3 |
> to understand what is the root of the f34R of udev being absorbed by |
4 |
> systemd: "it is supposedly unsupported upstream and might not work at |
5 |
> some point". |
6 |
> Well, as far as I can see, you are maintaining sys-fs/udev standalone |
7 |
> and don't intend to drop it. Even if you did, we could still pkgmove it |
8 |
> to systemd. My conclusion is that this claim of udev being a dead end |
9 |
> is pure FUD. |
10 |
|
11 |
This claim was made by upstream, no less. And it refers to *running* |
12 |
udev without systemd as opposed to building (which upstream already made |
13 |
impossible). |
14 |
|
15 |
Here is the exact wording: |
16 |
"Unless the systemd-haters prepare another |
17 |
kdbus userspace until then this will effectively also mean that we will |
18 |
not support non-systemd systems with udev anymore starting at that |
19 |
point. Gentoo folks, this is your wakeup call." |
20 |
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-May/019657.html |
21 |
|
22 |
Not sure what about this is FUD. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
Best regards, |
26 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |