Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-nfp] Request for vote on removal Matthew Thode from Trustees
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 01:29:42
Message-Id: 20180211012936.o2vfelmyh7zlozhf@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] Request for vote on removal Matthew Thode from Trustees by "Michał Górny"
1 On 18-02-11 01:11:52, Michał Górny wrote:
2 > Hello, everyone.
3 >
4 > As some of you may know I have been recently defamed on Gentoo mailing
5 > lists by one of the Trustees (at the time). I have been attempting to
6 > resolve this matter peacefully for 2 months now, and I haven't had any
7 > success in getting justice. In fact, I haven't received more than 8
8 > words from the Trustees on the matter.
9 >
10 > All things considered, I would like to request per Section 5.6 of Bylaws
11 > [1] a Foundation members vote on removal of Matthew Thode from his
12 > position as President of the Foundation and Trustee. I believe that
13 > Matthew has not succeeded in ensuring professional behavior among
14 > Trustees and that he has abused his position towards his private goals
15 > that were not in line with the best interests of Gentoo
16 > and the Foundation.
17 >
18 > To support my request, I will note here a number of facts regarding past
19 > actions of the Trustees during Matthew's term that I'm aware of and that
20 > I believe to be contrary to the best interest of Gentoo. I do not wish
21 > to defame anyone, therefore I will not comment on those actions, merely
22 > list them and link the evidence whenever publicly available. I leave
23 > judging those actions to the Foundation members.
24 >
25 > Please note that I'm not implying that all the listed facts are related
26 > to one another. However, I believe that all of them are relevant to
27 > judging Matthew's actions.
28 >
29 >
30 > 2017-01-05
31 > Matthew Thode lays out a proposal that merges the Council
32 > and Trustees into a single 'Board' on top of Foundation [2].
33 >
34 > 2017-01-11
35 > Matthew Thode lays out an alternative proposal in which Council
36 > is reduced to handling technical matters, and 'Board' gains control
37 > over ComRel [3].
38 >
39 > 2017-12-10
40 > Daniel Campbell (signed as a Trustee) sends a mail with a number of
41 > defaming accusations [4]. I have replied to that mail correcting
42 > the false facts, and I have opened a bug with Daniel in CC pointing
43 > this out [5].
44 >
45 > 2017-12-16
46 > Daniel Campbell sends his resignation mail in which he blames for it,
47 > and further defames me [6]. I have to point out here that he brings
48 > a few true facts for which I am sorry, and I specifically only mind
49 > those that are lies.
50 >
51 > 2017-12-16
52 > Matthew Thode files a ComRel bug [7] in which he requests banning me.
53 > In his request he mentions the decision of Daniel Campbell.
54 >
55 > 2018-01-03
56 > Daniel Campbell withdraws his resignation [8].
57 >
58 > 2018-01-14
59 > Matthew Thode apologizes to Rich Freeman for the defamation made
60 > by Daniel Campbell in his resignation thread [9].
61 >
62 > 2018-01-18
63 > Daniel Campbell resumes his activity on Bugzilla [10]. I repeat my
64 > request for correction of his defaming mails via direct mail. I never
65 > receive any reply from him.
66 >
67 > 2018-01-28
68 > Since Daniel Campbell has been acting as a Trustee, I send the same
69 > request to Trustees. The same day I receive a reply from Matthew Thode
70 > requesting clarification of the exact statements that are defaming.
71 >
72 > 2018-01-29
73 > I reply with exact list of defaming statements and explanation why
74 > they are false. I never receive any reply.
75 >
76 >
77 > At this point, 2 months have passed since the first defaming mail was
78 > sent, and 2 weeks have passed since the specific request to Trustees was
79 > sent. The mails still spread false information that is signed
80 > by a Trustee without any correction.
81 >
82 > All I ever asked for was correcting the false facts. Rich Freeman had to
83 > wait almost a month to get it. I am pleading for two months already,
84 > with no result.
85 >
86
87 I'm sorry that we haven't sent out an apology or retraction yet, we've
88 been gathering info on the situation before making a statement. The
89 first time I saw a request for comment on zlg's statement was two weeks
90 ago. I asked others for final input before I give a response tomorrow.
91
92 I sent this two hours ago.
93
94 17:07 < prometheanfire@> NeddySeagoon: not sure if still around (probably not), but I'm going to email out an appology (without stating fault) tomorrow, it'll go basically the same as the response to rich0
95 17:07 < prometheanfire@> robbat2: alicef kensington ^
96 17:08 < prometheanfire@> dabbott: ^
97 17:08 < prometheanfire@> klondike isn't here atm
98
99 > I do not know what Matthew Thode's motivation is for his actions or lack
100 > of them. However, I do believe that it is in the best interest of Gentoo
101 > and the Foundation to pursue peaceful and professional collaboration.
102 > Defaming posts made by a Trustee, followed by complete passiveness
103 > of the other Trustees in resolving the situation peacefully certainly
104 > do not serve this goal.
105 >
106 > Furthermore, I believe such actions make the Foundation vulnerable to
107 > lawsuits. I personally neither do wish or am capable of pursuing this
108 > but this doesn't change the fact. I believe that a responsible President
109 > would have apologized ASAP, as either actively or passively supporting
110 > this defamation serves no purpose to the Foundation.
111 >
112 > All those things considered, I believe that my only recourse at this
113 > point is to request a vote on removing Matthew Thode from the position
114 > he currently holds. I believe it is important that the President of
115 > Gentoo Foundaties is a person who can represent Gentoo professionally.
116 >
117 > If any of the matters I have brought here are incorrect, I apologize for
118 > that.
119 >
120 >
121 > [1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Foundation:Bylaws#Section_5.6._Resignation_and_Removal_of_Trustees
122 > [2]:https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/20eb05be025ee734fb01a0c9b35e38ef
123 > [3]:https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/d7e4a5fb53717fd4e6d961091d63fef1
124 > [4]:https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/16a584443dd6ea013a3dd7f57e9ecbcd
125 > [5]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/640470
126 > [6]:https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/c3755ad531fa6b0f1e481d88e42ee72f
127 > [7]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/641268
128 > [8]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/545022#c17
129 > [9]:https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/7801aefef15605be45111d189540516e
130 > [10]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/644902
131 >
132 > --
133 > Best regards,
134 > Michał Górny
135 >
136
137 You are welcome to call for a vote for removal as it is your right as a
138 current member. It'll have to get the election people involved and send
139 out a notice to all members (full election protocol I guess).
140
141 I will try and comment on my earlier proposals to merge the Foundation
142 and Council. The goal I had behind that was to have a clear org
143 structure for Gentoo. Currently there is not a clear conflict
144 resolution method when the Council and Foundation have differing
145 opinions on things. This didn't go well so I'm now trying to do joint
146 meetings so we at least work somewhat together (left hand knowing what
147 the right hand is doing).
148
149 --
150 Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies