| 1 |
On 6/7/20 2:45 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote: |
| 2 |
> Still, I wonder why patches are posted here instead of using GitHub, |
| 3 |
> because there is no public review process going on. To me, email-based |
| 4 |
> patches on the Gentoo Proxy Maintainer mailing list are at best mildly |
| 5 |
> annoying, and at worst an attempt at jumping the queue, i.e. to get |
| 6 |
> one's changes processed faster than those made through GitHub. They |
| 7 |
> also, in my perception, have a smell of "ooh, look at me, I am working" |
| 8 |
> about them. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I also wonder that. Especially when I know some of the contributors DO |
| 11 |
use Github. If you've read this list, you know my feelings about this |
| 12 |
subject. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The automated CI check is a huge plus for both parties, and when I think |
| 15 |
about it, the time spent should be rather equal whether you choose |
| 16 |
git-send-email or git push. But the review and the 'fixing' part is |
| 17 |
definitely cleaner with git push. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Now to your last sentence, I don't believe it's a matter of "attention |
| 20 |
seeking", but more some disgust towards Github. But I'd also like hear |
| 21 |
what's this all about. Would Gitlab be better than Github due to principles? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- juippis |
Archives