1 |
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Iain Buchanan <iaindb@××××××××××××.au> wrote: |
2 |
> I'm having issues with the latest mix of nvidia-drivers, xorg, and |
3 |
> whatever else it might be! |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I'm getting bad performance when switching virtual dekstops and moving |
6 |
> windows and such. GL screensavers seem to be ok though. |
7 |
|
8 |
Same here. My fast desktop with Core i7 920, Nvidia GX 240, has a |
9 |
slower KDE UI than my 6-year-old laptop that has AMD Athlon 3200+ and |
10 |
ATI Radeon Mobility 9700. Simply opening a konsole window on my |
11 |
desktop with compositing enabled can take 2-3 seconds, when it is |
12 |
instant on the laptop. |
13 |
|
14 |
People have been complaining about it for years, KDE and |
15 |
nvidia-drivers don't always get along with each other. The usual |
16 |
answer is that it works with Intel and ATI cards, and Nvidia's drivers |
17 |
are closed-source, so nobody can guess what the problem is and all we |
18 |
can do is hope Nvidia in their ivory tower can one day bless us with |
19 |
an update that makes things better. And then of course there are |
20 |
people who have Nvidia cards and everything works great and they don't |
21 |
know what the complainers are talking about. :) |
22 |
|
23 |
In my personal experience, on my Nvidia machine KDE 4.2 was the |
24 |
fastest, and it has gotten slower with each subsequent KDE release |
25 |
(with 4.5 being the worst one yet - so bad that I've disabled |
26 |
compositing entirely). Or maybe it has gotten slower with each |
27 |
nvidia-drivers release over the same period of time, I can't say. |
28 |
Maybe it is all a coincidence. |
29 |
|
30 |
However, on my old laptop with xorg radeon drivers, it has been |
31 |
getting faster with each KDE release, with KDE 4.5 is the fastest one |
32 |
yet. Both machines run latest everything on ~amd64. The only |
33 |
significant configuration difference between the two is nvidia-drivers |
34 |
vs radeon. |