1 |
Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> [10-04-01 20:36]: |
2 |
> meino.cramer@×××.de wrote: |
3 |
> >Hi, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> >I googled down some - often fairly outdated - texts about "the |
6 |
> >best filesystem" fpr a Linux box. Other texts focussed on |
7 |
> >uses, which do not aplly to me: Fileservers, webservers, database |
8 |
> >machines etc. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> >Wnat I want is a fast and stable (!) filesystem for a desktop PC |
11 |
> >with one 1TByte harddisk. Since using Gentoo and a lot of sources |
12 |
> >I do compile very often "bigger things" (blender-2.50 for example). |
13 |
> >Another thing: Due to my experimenting it is possible that I have to |
14 |
> >reboot "hard", which means, the filesystem will be unmounted not |
15 |
> >cleanly ("dirty" do to say...;) The choosen filesystem should be |
16 |
> >good in recovering such thing. |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> >I am currently using a vanilla 2.6.32.10 kernel. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> >The question, what remains is: What choose should I make? |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> >I thank you very much in advance for any help! |
23 |
> >Best regards, |
24 |
> >mcc |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I notice you have a fairly large drive. You may want to indicate |
29 |
> whether or not you will be putting large files on it or what not. If |
30 |
> you are, some files systems work better with large files. That said, |
31 |
> if you plan to have a lot of small files, then another file system may |
32 |
> work better. If you plan to have a mix, then it could get interesting. |
33 |
> ;-) |
34 |
> |
35 |
> I use reiserfs myself and have had no problems, even with a hard |
36 |
> shutdown or some other failure. Thing is, most file systems are good |
37 |
> but it depends on what you will be putting on it. From my experience, |
38 |
> don't use XFS unless you have a UPS and will not be having to pull the |
39 |
> plug. I tried XFS a while back and each time there was a hard |
40 |
> shutdown, I had to reinstall. It was running Mandriva so I didn't know |
41 |
> how to recover with it and no other bootable CD either. XFS has its |
42 |
> good points but surviving a power plug pull is not one of them. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> I will also say this, it is a good idea to ask first on this. There |
45 |
> are a lot of good file systems out there and each one has its strong |
46 |
> points. It's best to get the right one first rather than to have to |
47 |
> redo things later on. |
48 |
> |
49 |
> Dale |
50 |
> |
51 |
> :-) :-) |
52 |
> |
53 |
|
54 |
Hi, |
55 |
|
56 |
thanks for all the input to all who have answered ! :) |
57 |
|
58 |
I will try to characterize ("characterise" ?) what I plan to do with |
59 |
my TByte disk. |
60 |
My current drive is 200GByte and it becomes too small... |
61 |
I DONT LIKE (read: hate) to put CDs or DVDs into my drive, to mount |
62 |
it only to get access to documentations. CDs and DVDs as storage media |
63 |
in the sense of "backup" is ok, but (at least for me) as a replacement |
64 |
or extension to the harddisk it is much to slow (at least for me). |
65 |
|
66 |
So I have a lot of docs (specs of microcontrollers, howtos, programm |
67 |
and source code docs...etc) on my disk. |
68 |
This one part. |
69 |
|
70 |
Then: I often transer videos from my DVB-T-receiver/recorder to my |
71 |
harddisk to cut out the advertising and to transcode the videos to |
72 |
somethings better than "ts" (transport streams), |
73 |
This is another part. |
74 |
|
75 |
Then I plan to have two roots this time: One to experiment with and |
76 |
one "good and stable"-version which is used/updated/... "strictly as |
77 |
recommended". Filesizes and usage do vary here...take a look at your |
78 |
own roots ;))) |
79 |
|
80 |
Then I want something encrypted, either as a partition or as a files |
81 |
(carrying a encrypted fs), which I can copy to dvd and will be able |
82 |
to mount this dvd and use it without to have to copy the whole dvd |
83 |
first to harddisk before using it... |
84 |
Currently I am using encfs...(outdated?). What can I do use instead? |
85 |
This is for personal things like letters, photos, texts ... etc. |
86 |
Files vary from some kb up to about 2GByte (guessed). Most of them |
87 |
smaller than 200MByte |
88 |
|
89 |
Last thing: I have a lot iof copies of code from svn repositories because |
90 |
I like to have the "bleeding edge" of some projects (do you know the |
91 |
new Blender 2.50??? :O) |
92 |
|
93 |
This implies a lot of compile work. This will be the only case where |
94 |
files are created as often as read. |
95 |
|
96 |
Most files will be far more read than written... |
97 |
|
98 |
I have not planned a webserver, fileserve, extensive database usage (ok |
99 |
emerge and helpers a little of database usage...), experimental file |
100 |
creation and deletion...etcpp |
101 |
|
102 |
I would say...maximium file size will be around 4GB for all of that |
103 |
above, since everything above that I cannot backup onto DVDRWs.... |
104 |
|
105 |
May be this will give you a little "look inside my harddisk" ;) |
106 |
|
107 |
Any recommendations? |
108 |
|
109 |
keep hacking! ;) |
110 |
mcc |
111 |
|
112 |
|
113 |
|
114 |
-- |
115 |
Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments |
116 |
unless it's absolutely neccessary. - Send simply Text. |
117 |
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html |
118 |
In a world without fences and walls nobody needs gates and windows. |