1 |
2016-09-01 11:54 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>: |
2 |
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:49:43 +0300, gevisz wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> > If your filesystem becomes corrupt (and you are unable to |
5 |
>> > repair it), *all* of your data is lost (instead of just |
6 |
>> > one partition). That's the only disadvantage I can think |
7 |
>> > of. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> That is exactly what I am afraid of! |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> So, the 20-years old rule of thumb is still valid. :( |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> > I don't like partitions either (after some years, I |
14 |
>> > always found that sizes don't match my requirements any |
15 |
>> > more), |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> And this is exactly the reason why I do not want to partition |
18 |
>> my new hard drive! :) |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Have you considered LVM? You get the benefits of separate filesystems |
21 |
> without the limitations of inflexible partitioning. |
22 |
|
23 |
I am afraid of LVM because of the same reason as described below: |
24 |
|
25 |
returning to the "old good times" of MS DOS 6.22, I do remember that working |
26 |
then on 40MB (yes, megabytes) hard drive I used some program that compressed |
27 |
all the data before saving them on that hard drive. Unfortunately, one day, |
28 |
because of the corruption, I lost all the data on that hard drive. Since then, |
29 |
I am very much afraid of compressed or encrypted hard drives. |
30 |
|
31 |
> Neil Bothwick |
32 |
> |
33 |
> For a list of all the ways technology has failed to improve the |
34 |
> quality of life, please press three. |