Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-hosted code review |
| Date: | Sun, 01 Nov 2015 17:45:11 |
| Message-Id: | n15j2a$lu4$1@ger.gmane.org |
| 1 | There's been a lot of discussion about relying on GitHub for pull |
| 2 | requests and code review and such, so I have set up a Phabricator |
| 3 | instance against gentoo.git to see how a free alternative might work. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Here's a few examples of how things could work: |
| 6 | |
| 7 | General post-commit review: |
| 8 | http://phabricator.astralcloak.net/rGENTOO27ba62d0c7fcabdc79ce82a064b43d67b3b11cca |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Tracking commits with issues that need attention: |
| 11 | http://phabricator.astralcloak.net/audit/query/open/ |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Pre-commit review: http://phabricator.astralcloak.net/D1 |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Phabricator also has all sorts of fancy (optional) features that could |
| 16 | be useful for collaborative development (see http://phabricator.org/ for |
| 17 | more info). |
| 18 | |
| 19 | What do you think? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-hosted code review | James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-hosted code review | Bertrand Jacquin <bertrand@×××××××.bzh> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-hosted code review | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-hosted code review | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-hosted code review | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-hosted code review | Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o> |