| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask |
Thomas Anderson |
Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:59:03 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Label profiles with EAPI for compatibility checks |
Alec Warner |
Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:59:45 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets |
Ryan Hill |
Sat, 04 Oct 2008 06:43:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets (revised) |
Marius Mauch |
Sat, 04 Oct 2008 06:08:00 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets |
Ryan Hill |
Sat, 04 Oct 2008 06:06:45 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask |
Ryan Hill |
Sat, 04 Oct 2008 05:49:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets (revised) |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Sat, 04 Oct 2008 03:46:54 |
| [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Label profiles with EAPI for compatibility checks |
Zac Medico |
Sat, 04 Oct 2008 00:10:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-misc/anki: metadata.xml Manifest anki-0.9.8.1.ebuild ChangeLog |
Thomas Sachau |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 22:19:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask |
Alec Warner |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:16:45 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-misc/anki: metadata.xml Manifest anki-0.9.8.1.ebuild ChangeLog |
Christian Faulhammer |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:09:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets (revised) |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:54:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets (revised) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:15:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask |
Thomas Sachau |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:06:52 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask |
Duncan |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:29:44 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: proj/en/perl/outdated-cpan-packages.xml automatic update |
Torsten Veller |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:47:10 |
| [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets (revised) |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:11:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask |
Alec Warner |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:10:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask |
Mart Raudsepp |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:08:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: proj/en/perl/outdated-cpan-packages.xml automatic update |
Robin H. Johnson |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:52:32 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: proj/en/perl/outdated-cpan-packages.xml automatic update |
Torsten Veller |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:33:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask |
Jeroen Roovers |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:16:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask |
Dawid Węgliński |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:23:44 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask |
Jeroen Roovers |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:15:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] proj/en/perl/outdated-cpan-packages.xml automatic update |
Robin H. Johnson |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:01:07 |
| [gentoo-dev] proj/en/perl/outdated-cpan-packages.xml automatic update |
Robin H. Johnson |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 01:36:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask |
Josh Saddler |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 01:09:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask |
Alec Warner |
Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:56:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask |
Jeremy Olexa |
Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:41:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask |
Jeroen Roovers |
Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:30:27 |
| [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask |
Jeroen Roovers |
Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:24:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets |
Robert Bridge |
Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:19:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] UTF-8 in GLEP56 use flags? |
Jan Kundrát |
Thu, 02 Oct 2008 06:29:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:52:01 |
| [gentoo-dev] kdeprefix use flag |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:42:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] UTF-8 in GLEP56 use flags? |
Robin H. Johnson |
Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:52:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Usages of CVS $Header$ keyword in ebuilds - use cases wanted |
Robin H. Johnson |
Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:36:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] UTF-8 in GLEP56 use flags? |
Ben de Groot |
Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:30:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Migrating to EAPI 2 and econf |
Alexis Ballier |
Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:04:30 |
| [gentoo-dev] UTF-8 in GLEP56 use flags? WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/qt-assistant: ChangeLog qt-assistant-4.4.1.ebuild qt-assistant-4.4.2.ebuild metadata.xml |
Robin H. Johnson |
Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:54:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets |
Zac Medico |
Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:37:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Usages of CVS $Header$ keyword in ebuilds - use cases wanted |
Thilo Bangert |
Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:33:42 |
| [gentoo-dev] Migrating to EAPI 2 and econf |
Petteri Räty |
Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:48:11 |
| [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for October |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:30:12 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets |
Ryan Hill |
Wed, 01 Oct 2008 04:36:32 |
Archives