Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass |
hasufell |
Sat, 02 Jun 2012 02:54:01 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] games.eclass: allow EAPI=4 |
Mike Frysinger |
Sat, 02 Jun 2012 01:48:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Rich Freeman |
Sat, 02 Jun 2012 00:53:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
James Cloos |
Sat, 02 Jun 2012 00:18:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] multiprocessing.eclass: doing parallel work in bash |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 22:51:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 22:50:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] m68k status |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 22:45:04 |
[gentoo-dev] multiprocessing.eclass: doing parallel work in bash |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 22:42:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Michael Weber |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 20:51:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
William Hubbs |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 19:23:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:29:49 |
Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Robin H. Johnson |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:38:05 |
Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Kent Fredric |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:57:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Kent Fredric |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:55:58 |
Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Robin H. Johnson |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:36:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Robin H. Johnson |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:34:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
W. Trevor King |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:20:09 |
Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Kent Fredric |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:15:04 |
Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:14:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Kent Fredric |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:57:46 |
Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:55:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
William Hubbs |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:46:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:40:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:39:37 |
Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:37:25 |
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:29:50 |
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Kent Fredric |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:26:55 |
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:14:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:10:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Kent Fredric |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:38:27 |
[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: app-misc/gcal |
Ulrich Mueller |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:19:23 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Nicolas Sebrecht |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:26:42 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Duncan |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:58:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Alexey Shvetsov |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:49:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:43:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:44:37 |
[gentoo-dev] m68k status |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:39:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Kent Fredric |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:24:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:55:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:50:18 |
[gentoo-dev] lastrite x11-terms/cxterm |
Samuli Suominen |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:07:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Kent Fredric |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 08:41:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 08:18:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Kent Fredric |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 04:56:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 04:05:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 04:00:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 02:50:43 |