Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev in March 2004

Subject From Date
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATH] Where I can send a patch..? Seemant Kulleen Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:13:17
[gentoo-dev] [PATH] Where I can send a patch..? Damian Kolkowski Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:02:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] qmail-scanner depends on qmail (what about qmail-ldap?) Benjamin Coles Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:02:21
[gentoo-dev] extra step when adding new use flags Jason Wever Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:50:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need selinux policy dependancy Donny Davies Wed, 31 Mar 2004 18:15:41
[gentoo-dev] Mostly unavailable 2004/04/01 to 2004/12/31 due to military duty Sven Blumenstein Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:51:29
Re: [gentoo-dev] qmail-scanner depends on qmail (what about qmail-ldap?) Aiko Barz Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:51:06
[gentoo-dev] Question on /etc/crontab installed by vixie-cron-3.0.1-r4 Paul Varner Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:51:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] my ebuild Meir Kriheli Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:15:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] Source code visualization tools? Matthew Kennedy Wed, 31 Mar 2004 06:35:34
[gentoo-dev] cleaning update files Marius Mauch Wed, 31 Mar 2004 06:28:28
Re: [gentoo-dev] Local classic USE flag - dev-db/firebird Spider Wed, 31 Mar 2004 06:23:00
[gentoo-dev] Local classic USE flag - dev-db/firebird Meir Kriheli Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:37:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need selinux policy dependancy Chris PeBenito Tue, 30 Mar 2004 21:12:35
[gentoo-dev] Packages that need selinux policy dependancy Joshua Brindle Tue, 30 Mar 2004 19:55:22
[gentoo-dev] Fresh blood! Deedra Waters Tue, 30 Mar 2004 18:38:44
Re: [gentoo-dev] Problems with emerge -g option... Donnie Berkholz Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:31:13
Re: [gentoo-dev] Screem status Sven Vermeulen Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:09:01
Re: [gentoo-dev] Screem status Xavier Neys Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:31:36
[gentoo-dev] Screem status Dejan Nikic Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:25:34
[gentoo-dev] position of inherit in ebuilds and checking via repoman Andrew Ross Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:13:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] my ebuild Patrick Kursawe Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:25:18
Re: [gentoo-dev] Problems with emerge -g option... Stewart Honsberger Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:56:49
Re: [gentoo-dev] my ebuild Aleksandr Guidrevitch Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:27:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/gmp on hppa Mike Frysinger Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:55:42
[gentoo-dev] my ebuild Aleksandr Guidrevitch Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:28:41
Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild dependencies Eivind Tagseth Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:23:27
[gentoo-dev] Definition of virtual/x11 Donnie Berkholz Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:38:08
Re: [gentoo-dev] cvs ebuilds Mike Frysinger Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:34:22
Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild dependencies Mike Frysinger Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:33:58
[gentoo-dev] XFree86 4.2 -- Ready to die Donnie Berkholz Tue, 30 Mar 2004 05:28:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. John Nilsson Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:53:35
Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. Joshua Brindle Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:03:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] Source code visualization tools? Chris Smith Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:06:51
[gentoo-dev] ebuild dependencies Lukasz Strzygowski Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:10:42
[gentoo-dev] cvs ebuilds Andrew Gaffney Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:27:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] stage23 John Davis Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:20:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] Source code visualization tools? Gerhard W. Gruber Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:14:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] Source code visualization tools? Joel Martin Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:02:29
[gentoo-dev] Re: Source code visualization tools? Joel Konkle-Parker Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:59:46
[gentoo-dev] Re: Source code visualization tools? Tom Payne Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:56:47
[gentoo-dev] Source code visualization tools? Joel Konkle-Parker Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:50:43
Re: [gentoo-dev] Problems with emerge -g option... stephen white Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:48:13
Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. John Nilsson Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:02:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] Problems with emerge -g option... Paul de Vrieze Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:51:43
Re: [gentoo-dev] Problems with emerge -g option... Jason Stubbs Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:27:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] Problems with emerge -g option... stephen white Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:14:14
[gentoo-dev] stage23 francis Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:08:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] Problems with emerge -g option... Jason Stubbs Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:57:44
[gentoo-dev] Problems with emerge -g option... stephen white Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:25:10
Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. Paul de Vrieze Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:49:06
[gentoo-dev] dev-libs/gmp on hppa Stuart Herbert Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:43:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] qmail-scanner depends on qmail (what about qmail-ldap?) Andrew Ross Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:09:24
[gentoo-dev] New USE flag: gmp Stuart Herbert Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:49:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] qmail-scanner depends on qmail (what about qmail-ldap?) Benjamin Coles Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:02:04
[gentoo-dev] Out of pocket for a couple of weeks Jay Maynard Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:24:22
Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. Sami Näätänen Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:02:27
Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: SeJo Luca Barbato Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:49:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] qmail-scanner depends on qmail (what about qmail-ldap?) Robin H. Johnson Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:25:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] qmail-scanner depends on qmail (what about qmail-ldap?) Andrew Ross Sun, 28 Mar 2004 06:33:50
Re: [gentoo-dev] Licensing pitfalls with net-www/mozilla-firefox Karl Trygve Kalleberg Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:05:42
Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. Georgi Georgiev Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:53:31
Re: [gentoo-dev] Creating multiple "installations" on the same host Georgi Georgiev Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:47:22
Re: [gentoo-dev] 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. Paul de Vrieze Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:14:30
Re: [gentoo-dev] PGP/GPG keys/signatures? possibly OT? Paul de Vrieze Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:09:44
Re: [Fwd: Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage.] Paul de Vrieze Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:07:13
Re: [gentoo-dev] yet another virtual question Paul de Vrieze Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:04:10
Re: [gentoo-dev] yet another virtual question Jay Maynard Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:14:49
Re: [gentoo-dev] qmail-scanner depends on qmail (what about qmail-ldap?) Aiko Barz Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:47:59
[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Documentation Project - Status Update Sven Vermeulen Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:45:15
[gentoo-dev] PGP/GPG keys/signatures? possibly OT? Allen Dale Parker Sat, 27 Mar 2004 07:26:14
Re: [gentoo-dev] yet another virtual question Daniel Armyr Sat, 27 Mar 2004 06:17:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] qmail-scanner depends on qmail (what about qmail-ldap?) Mike Frysinger Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:45:35
Re: [gentoo-dev] qmail-scanner depends on qmail (what about qmail-ldap?) Mike Frysinger Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:26:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. Andrew Cowie Sat, 27 Mar 2004 03:37:55
Re: [Fwd: Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage.] Stroller Sat, 27 Mar 2004 00:34:00
[Fwd: Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage.] Patrick Lauer Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:03:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. Robin H. Johnson Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:51:00
Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. Sami Näätänen Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:21:42
Re: [gentoo-dev] yet another virtual question Stuart Herbert Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:16:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] yet another virtual question Stuart Herbert Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:12:43
Re: [gentoo-dev] yet another virtual question Marius Mauch Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:54:50
Re: [gentoo-dev] yet another virtual question Jason Rhinelander Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:38:50
Re: [gentoo-dev] yet another virtual question Caleb Tennis Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:36:13
Re: [gentoo-dev] yet another virtual question Don Seiler Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:32:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] yet another virtual question Seemant Kulleen Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:29:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] yet another virtual question Peter Johanson Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:01:10
[gentoo-dev] yet another virtual question Seemant Kulleen Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:52:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] Programming advice wanted? Bart Lauwers Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:14:31
Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. Koon Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:54:38
Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. Paul de Vrieze Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:41:32
Re: [gentoo-dev] 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. Paul de Vrieze Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:31:29
Re: [gentoo-dev] 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. Jesse Nelson Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:40:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. Paul de Vrieze Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:23:09
Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: SeJo Deedra Waters Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:34:51
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: SeJo Paul de Vrieze Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:27:09
Re: [gentoo-dev] Redux: 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. Paul de Vrieze Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:23:33
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: SeJo Lance Albertson Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:08:04
[gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: SeJo Eamon Caddigan Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:04:37
Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: SeJo Lance Albertson Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:02:16