Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] g15 and freevo up for grabs |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:06:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3 |
Tiziano Müller |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:46:43 |
[gentoo-dev] g15 and freevo up for grabs |
Robert Buchholz |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:56:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: adding a modification timestamp to the installed pkgs database (vdb) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:37:33 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Peter Hjalmarsson |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:09:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: adding a modification timestamp to the installed pkgs database (vdb) |
Brian Harring |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:42:59 |
[gentoo-dev] new USE_EXPAND variable: XTABLES_ADDONS_MODULES |
Peter Volkov |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:57:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Michael Haubenwallner |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:57:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Antoni Grzymala |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:13:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Alex Alexander |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:09:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3 |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:07:20 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Peter Hjalmarsson |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:07:09 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3 |
Torsten Veller |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:23:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Support for multiple ABIs for amd64 (64bit,32bit) in multilib overlay |
Denis Dupeyron |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:02:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:28:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn |
Richard Freeman |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 02:17:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:44:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn |
Ben de Groot |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:24:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Sebastian Pipping |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:39:18 |
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2010-01-17 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:16:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] how to indicate "co-maintainers welcome"? |
Mike Frysinger |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:31:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn |
Thilo Bangert |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:27:16 |
[gentoo-dev] how to indicate "co-maintainers welcome"? |
Thilo Bangert |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:13:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3 |
Mike Frysinger |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:31:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3 |
David Leverton |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:13:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn |
Mike Frysinger |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:12:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3 |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:49:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn |
Richard Freeman |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:44:41 |
[gentoo-dev] Election for the Gentoo Council empty seat results (council200912) |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:42:12 |
[gentoo-dev] RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3 |
Petteri Räty |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:39:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Thilo Bangert |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:32:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn |
Thilo Bangert |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:22:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LibGL.la removal news item for =eselect-opengl-1.1.1-r2 going stable |
Max Arnold |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:10:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LibGL.la removal news item for =eselect-opengl-1.1.1-r2 going stable |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:45:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LibGL.la removal news item for =eselect-opengl-1.1.1-r2 going stable |
Krzysiek Pawlik |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:28:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LibGL.la removal news item for =eselect-opengl-1.1.1-r2 going stable |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:20:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:04:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LibGL.la removal news item for =eselect-opengl-1.1.1-r2 going stable |
Vaeth |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:58:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LibGL.la removal news item for =eselect-opengl-1.1.1-r2 going stable |
Ben de Groot |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:38:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Lars Wendler |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:19:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LibGL.la removal news item for =eselect-opengl-1.1.1-r2 going stable |
Petteri Räty |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:09:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LibGL.la removal news item for =eselect-opengl-1.1.1-r2 going stable |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:42:15 |
[gentoo-dev] LibGL.la removal news item for =eselect-opengl-1.1.1-r2 going stable |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:26:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: adding a modification timestamp to the installed pkgs database (vdb) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:09:35 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: adding a modification timestamp to the installed pkgs database (vdb) |
Christian Faulhammer |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 10:49:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a modification timestamp to the installed pkgs database (vdb) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:46:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a modification timestamp to the installed pkgs database (vdb) |
Tobias Klausmann |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:25:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:01:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a modification timestamp to the installed pkgs database (vdb) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:00:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Benedikt Böhm |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 08:20:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Mike Frysinger |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 01:28:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Benedikt Böhm |
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:13:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 23:56:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Antoni Grzymala |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:38:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Antoni Grzymala |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:38:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Michael Higgins |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:34:06 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Peter Hjalmarsson |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:58:31 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Peter Hjalmarsson |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:53:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:38:30 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Jörg Schaible |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:31:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:31:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:26:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:22:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:17:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: ccc.eclass |
Petteri Räty |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 13:30:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
dev-random@××××.ru |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 13:07:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Ben de Groot |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 12:57:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Ben de Groot |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 12:57:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Pacho Ramos |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 12:00:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:46:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Fabian Groffen |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:18:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Lars Wendler |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:12:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Peter Volkov |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 08:15:21 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/ruby-libgda |
Hans de Graaff |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:08:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Mike Frysinger |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:40:16 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Duncan |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 03:09:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:55:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Mike Frysinger |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:46:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:25:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:37:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Ben de Groot |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:41:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Dawid Węgliński |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:41:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:34:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Dawid Węgliński |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:26:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Alex Legler |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:44:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Jeremy Olexa |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:44:17 |
[gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again) |
Sebastian Pipping |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:37:10 |
[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: app-i18n/qimhangul |
Markos Chandras |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:53:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn |
Ben de Groot |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:09:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn |
Victor Ostorga |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:50:36 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: bash version in ebuilds/eclasses...non-compliance and what to do? |
Christian Faulhammer |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:14:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm |
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:19:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] bash version in ebuilds/eclasses...non-compliance and what to do? |
Fabian Groffen |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:46:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:32:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm |
Max Arnold |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 07:54:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] bash version in ebuilds/eclasses...non-compliance and what to do? |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:34:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm |
Robin H. Johnson |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:48:52 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm |
Paul Arthur |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:11:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:28:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm |
Petteri Räty |
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:26:19 |