Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev in October 2013

Subject From Date
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.13.ebuild wireshark-1.8.5.ebuild ChangeLog Jeroen Roovers Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:07:49
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.13.ebuild wireshark-1.8.5.ebuild ChangeLog hasufell Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:00:48
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.13.ebuild wireshark-1.8.5.ebuild ChangeLog Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:57:43
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.13.ebuild wireshark-1.8.5.ebuild ChangeLog hasufell Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:42:33
Re: [gentoo-dev] afterstep herd is empty Pacho Ramos Wed, 09 Oct 2013 18:11:48
Re: [gentoo-dev] afterstep herd is empty Samuli Suominen Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:57:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] afterstep herd is empty Pacho Ramos Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:42:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] afterstep herd is empty Samuli Suominen Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:37:36
Re: [gentoo-dev] afterstep herd is empty Pacho Ramos Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:20:27
[gentoo-dev] Last rite: dev-games/gigi Thomas Kahle Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:12:18
[gentoo-dev] openrc-0.12.2 stable candidate William Hubbs Tue, 08 Oct 2013 20:26:12
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2013-10-06 23h59 UTC Robin H. Johnson Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:25:09
Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach? "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." Sun, 06 Oct 2013 16:11:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach? Richard Yao Sun, 06 Oct 2013 07:50:08
Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach? Chris Stankevitz Sun, 06 Oct 2013 07:05:18
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps Kent Fredric Fri, 04 Oct 2013 23:59:50
[gentoo-dev] afterstep herd is empty Bernard Cafarelli Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:23:10
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." Fri, 04 Oct 2013 04:03:41
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps Kent Fredric Thu, 03 Oct 2013 22:30:32
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." Thu, 03 Oct 2013 16:11:42
Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop experience on smartphone: thoughts and plans against Ubuntu edge heroxbd@g.o Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:28:08
Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop experience on smartphone: thoughts and plans against Ubuntu edge heroxbd@g.o Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:21:00
[gentoo-dev] Re: Addition of systemd subprofiles Pacho Ramos Thu, 03 Oct 2013 05:36:26
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps Kent Fredric Wed, 02 Oct 2013 18:50:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps hasufell Wed, 02 Oct 2013 17:32:34
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps yac Wed, 02 Oct 2013 16:43:24
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps Kent Fredric Tue, 01 Oct 2013 21:12:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps Peter Stuge Tue, 01 Oct 2013 19:52:07
[gentoo-dev] Addition of systemd subprofiles Pacho Ramos Tue, 01 Oct 2013 19:10:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." Tue, 01 Oct 2013 16:10:21
[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn Tue, 01 Oct 2013 15:53:07
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps Jeroen Roovers Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:27:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps Jeroen Roovers Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:14:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps Jeroen Roovers Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:45:14