Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.13.ebuild wireshark-1.8.5.ebuild ChangeLog |
Jeroen Roovers |
Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:07:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.13.ebuild wireshark-1.8.5.ebuild ChangeLog |
hasufell |
Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:00:48 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.13.ebuild wireshark-1.8.5.ebuild ChangeLog |
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina |
Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:57:43 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/wireshark: wireshark-1.6.13.ebuild wireshark-1.8.5.ebuild ChangeLog |
hasufell |
Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:42:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] afterstep herd is empty |
Pacho Ramos |
Wed, 09 Oct 2013 18:11:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] afterstep herd is empty |
Samuli Suominen |
Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:57:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] afterstep herd is empty |
Pacho Ramos |
Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:42:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] afterstep herd is empty |
Samuli Suominen |
Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:37:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] afterstep herd is empty |
Pacho Ramos |
Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:20:27 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rite: dev-games/gigi |
Thomas Kahle |
Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:12:18 |
[gentoo-dev] openrc-0.12.2 stable candidate |
William Hubbs |
Tue, 08 Oct 2013 20:26:12 |
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2013-10-06 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:25:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach? |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Sun, 06 Oct 2013 16:11:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach? |
Richard Yao |
Sun, 06 Oct 2013 07:50:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach? |
Chris Stankevitz |
Sun, 06 Oct 2013 07:05:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps |
Kent Fredric |
Fri, 04 Oct 2013 23:59:50 |
[gentoo-dev] afterstep herd is empty |
Bernard Cafarelli |
Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:23:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Fri, 04 Oct 2013 04:03:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps |
Kent Fredric |
Thu, 03 Oct 2013 22:30:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Thu, 03 Oct 2013 16:11:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop experience on smartphone: thoughts and plans against Ubuntu edge |
heroxbd@g.o |
Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:28:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop experience on smartphone: thoughts and plans against Ubuntu edge |
heroxbd@g.o |
Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:21:00 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Addition of systemd subprofiles |
Pacho Ramos |
Thu, 03 Oct 2013 05:36:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps |
Kent Fredric |
Wed, 02 Oct 2013 18:50:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps |
hasufell |
Wed, 02 Oct 2013 17:32:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps |
yac |
Wed, 02 Oct 2013 16:43:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps |
Kent Fredric |
Tue, 01 Oct 2013 21:12:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps |
Peter Stuge |
Tue, 01 Oct 2013 19:52:07 |
[gentoo-dev] Addition of systemd subprofiles |
Pacho Ramos |
Tue, 01 Oct 2013 19:10:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Tue, 01 Oct 2013 16:10:21 |
[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Tue, 01 Oct 2013 15:53:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps |
Jeroen Roovers |
Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:27:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps |
Jeroen Roovers |
Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:14:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps |
Jeroen Roovers |
Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:45:14 |