| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: status of OpenRC's public API |
William Hubbs |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 21:01:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Moving project pages to wiki.gentoo.org |
Alex Legler |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 21:00:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: status of OpenRC's public API |
Mike Gilbert |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:27:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: status of OpenRC's public API |
William Hubbs |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:04:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 19:57:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 19:53:48 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 19:52:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 19:37:39 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
William Hubbs |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 19:32:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 19:19:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
William Hubbs |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 19:16:19 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Moving project pages to wiki.gentoo.org |
Mike Gilbert |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:38:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:15:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:08:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Sven Eden |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:40:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach? |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:22:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach? |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:02:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach? |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:52:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach? |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:49:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:39:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Sven Eden |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:26:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Alan McKinnon |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:11:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:05:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:52:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:09:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
hasufell |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:47:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:43:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:35:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:20:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach? |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:44:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:34:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Samuli Suominen |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:24:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach? |
Peter Volkov |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:16:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Thomas Sachau |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:06:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:58:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch |
Sergey Popov |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:19:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Martin Gysel |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 06:37:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
William Hubbs |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 02:43:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Kent Fredric |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 01:18:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 01:01:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:39:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:57:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Kent Fredric |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:27:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 22:35:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 22:18:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
heroxbd@g.o |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 22:09:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 22:06:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:55:42 |
| [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr |
William Hubbs |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:43:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:39:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch |
Pacho Ramos |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 20:55:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 20:51:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
hasufell |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 20:41:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 20:14:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 20:06:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch |
Markos Chandras |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:08:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach? |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:47:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch |
Agostino Sarubbo |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:28:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: status of OpenRC's public API |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:22:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: status of OpenRC's public API |
William Hubbs |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:15:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:56:45 |
| [gentoo-dev] markdown docs like README.md |
hasufell |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:49:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] Sub-phase functions in autotools-utils & autotools-multilib |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:28:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] Sub-phase functions in autotools-utils & autotools-multilib |
Greg Turner |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:41:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Sergey Popov |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 07:39:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch |
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:42:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] Sub-phase functions in autotools-utils & autotools-multilib |
Greg Turner |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:39:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] Sub-phase functions in autotools-utils & autotools-multilib |
Greg Turner |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:28:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] Sub-phase functions in autotools-utils & autotools-multilib |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:16:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] Sub-phase functions in autotools-utils & autotools-multilib |
Greg Turner |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:59:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch |
Markos Chandras |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:42:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch |
Alexis Ballier |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:31:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:22:13 |
| [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch |
Agostino Sarubbo |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:04:01 |
| [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-firmware/amd-ucode |
Markos Chandras |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 19:30:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Markos Chandras |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 18:32:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Markos Chandras |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 18:30:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unstable/testing keywords |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:05:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unstable/testing keywords |
Jack Morgan |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:17:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Alexis Ballier |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:55:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:23:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Alexis Ballier |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:07:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: unstable/testing keywords |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:01:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:57:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Alexis Ballier |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:46:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Samuli Suominen |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:36:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Samuli Suominen |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:26:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:22:44 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Michael Palimaka |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:18:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Samuli Suominen |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:11:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Samuli Suominen |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:09:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:52:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-misc/emelfm2: emelfm2-0.9.0.ebuild metadata.xml ChangeLog |
Jeroen Roovers |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:22:57 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Michael Palimaka |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:20:20 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: unstable/testing keywords |
Michael Palimaka |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:14:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unstable/testing keywords |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:05:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unstable/testing keywords |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:03:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unstable/testing keywords |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:59:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: m68k, s390, and sh are dropping stable keywords |
Samuli Suominen |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:35:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] does v8 shared library make sense with current upstream approach? |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 09:48:45 |
Archives