| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] xfree is done for ! |
Anthony Gorecki |
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 04:33:16 |
| [gentoo-dev] xfree is done for ! |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 04:16:15 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Not considering dropping the hardened toolchain |
Duncan |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:06:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA-2 and "gentoo" CVS module |
Chris Gianelloni |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:48:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA-2 and "gentoo" CVS module |
Chris Gianelloni |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:43:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA-2 and "gentoo" CVS module |
Ned Ludd |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:18:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -U getting removed? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:04:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -U getting removed? |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:00:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] CIA-2 and "gentoo" CVS module |
Ned Ludd |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:50:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Chris Gianelloni |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:24:23 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-hardened] Not considering dropping the hardened toolchain |
Dave Monnier, IT Security Office, Indiana University |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:19:45 |
| [gentoo-dev] CIA-2 and "gentoo" CVS module |
Chris Gianelloni |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:10:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -U getting removed? |
Doug Goldstein |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:08:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Ned Ludd |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:00:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Chris Gianelloni |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:44:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Ned Ludd |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:07:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] s390 repoman |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:12:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Ned Ludd |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:01:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Not considering dropping the hardened toolchain |
Ferris McCormick |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:33:15 |
| [gentoo-dev] s390 repoman |
Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:17:16 |
| [gentoo-dev] Not considering dropping the hardened toolchain |
Ned Ludd |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:02:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Rumen Yotov |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:43:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Helmar Wieland |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:30:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Chris Gianelloni |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:59:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Paul de Vrieze |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:47:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Chris Gianelloni |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:23:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Luke-Jr |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:53:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Paul de Vrieze |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:49:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Joshua Brindle |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:45:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Chris Gianelloni |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:16:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Chris Gianelloni |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:14:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Carsten Lohrke |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:05:31 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Duncan |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:02:12 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Duncan |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:48:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] doc_about_ebuild_functions |
Aaron Walker |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:33:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Paul de Vrieze |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:49:44 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] doc_about_ebuild_functions |
Christian Parpart |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:02:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] doc_about_ebuild_functions |
Marius Mauch |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:29:33 |
| [gentoo-dev] doc_about_ebuild_functions |
Tamas Sarga |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:09:47 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Joel Konkle-Parker |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 05:10:21 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Joel Konkle-Parker |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 04:59:06 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -U getting removed? |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 01:29:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] s390 status |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 01:28:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] s390 status |
Michael Imhof |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:16:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Segregating KDE? |
Simone Gotti |
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:04:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] s390 status |
Joshua Brindle |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:29:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
foser |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:55:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] s390 status |
Michael Imhof |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:58:00 |
| [gentoo-dev] Official support for s390 to be dropped |
Brian Jackson |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:24:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Malte S. Stretz |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:53:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
John Davis |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:47:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Malte S. Stretz |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:45:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Carsten Lohrke |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:18:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Paul de Vrieze |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:52:39 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Paul de Vrieze |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:32:00 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Ioannis Aslanidis |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:07:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Carsten Lohrke |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:42:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Dan Armak |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:35:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Carsten Lohrke |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:35:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Malte S. Stretz |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:19:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Dan Armak |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:43:29 |
| [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles |
Benjamin Judas |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:41:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -U getting removed? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:40:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Dan Armak |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:37:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Malte S. Stretz |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:36:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -U getting removed? |
Luke-Jr |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:25:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Carsten Lohrke |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:22:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Armando Di Cianno |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:53:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Sami Samhuri |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:49:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Dan Armak |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:39:30 |
| [gentoo-dev] 2004.3-prerelease stages |
Benjamin Judas |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:41:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -U getting removed? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:58:10 |
| [gentoo-dev] emerge -U getting removed? |
Jeffrey Forman |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:24:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Malte S. Stretz |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:47:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Paul de Vrieze |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:07:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Paul de Vrieze |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:51:40 |
| [gentoo-dev] Danish linuxmagazine on the look for good articles |
Sven Vermeulen |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:51:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Paul de Vrieze |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:44:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Simon Watson |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 07:48:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Joshua J. Berry |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 06:09:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Luke-Jr |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 04:48:00 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 04:27:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Dan Armak |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 04:09:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Luke-Jr |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 03:50:48 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:58:54 |
| [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords |
Daniel Ahlberg |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:49:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Luke-Jr |
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:04:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Armando Di Cianno |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 23:34:57 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Thomas Weidner |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 23:07:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] s390 status |
Greg KH |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 23:03:00 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Joshua J. Berry |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:35:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Joshua J. Berry |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:23:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Considering dropping the hardened toolchain (A Quantitive Approach) |
Lars Weiler |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:17:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Luke-Jr |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:55:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] s390 status |
Mike Frysinger |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:23:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Malte S. Stretz |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:23:39 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] s390 status |
Ned Ludd |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:14:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Segregating KDE? |
Simone Gotti |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:55:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Dan Armak |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:36:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:32:41 |
Archives