| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:17:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:10:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: remove annoying "You should enable -g (or higher) for debugging!" message |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:38:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Reducing glibc's default locale.gen |
Matt Turner |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:15:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:56:37 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Duncan |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:18:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:18:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Samuli Suominen |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:50:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Patrick Lauer |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:47:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:43:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:29:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Patrick Lauer |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:24:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Reducing glibc's default locale.gen |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 07:41:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: an eclass for github snapshots? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 07:18:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: an eclass for github snapshots? |
Hans de Graaff |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 06:03:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Dale |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 03:46:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 03:45:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: include dbus session handling in baselayout (or somewhere, in which case where?) |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 03:11:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 03:09:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: catalyst should use pbzip2 for stages |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 02:07:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: include dbus session handling in baselayout (or somewhere, in which case where?) |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 02:03:39 |
| [gentoo-dev] Council 2011 / 2012 election nomination |
David |
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 00:53:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Dale |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:42:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:01:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: include dbus session handling in baselayout (or somewhere, in which case where?) |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:12:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Matt Turner |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:09:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:48:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:46:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Alec Warner |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:44:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:39:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:35:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Matt Turner |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:33:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Matt Turner |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:29:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Dane Smith |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:27:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:24:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request) |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:21:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Samuli Suominen |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:15:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:15:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:11:06 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Dane Smith |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:52:06 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: catalyst should use pbzip2 for stages |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:26:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Reducing glibc's default locale.gen |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:21:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Crossdev / glib news item |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:02:10 |
| [gentoo-dev] Reducing glibc's default locale.gen |
Matt Turner |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:01:39 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:01:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: an eclass for github snapshots? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:17:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: an eclass for github snapshots? |
Donnie Berkholz |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:18:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Rendering the official Gentoo logo / Blender,2.04, Python 2.2 |
Mario Bodemann |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:18:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 08:37:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: sys-fs/evms |
Sebastian Pipping |
Tue, 07 Jun 2011 03:31:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Test request: open-iscsi 2.0.872 |
Jeroen Roovers |
Mon, 06 Jun 2011 01:54:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage |
Zac Medico |
Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:29:28 |
| [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2011-06-05 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:25:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage |
Matt Turner |
Sun, 05 Jun 2011 23:45:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Test request: open-iscsi 2.0.872 |
Stefan Behte |
Sun, 05 Jun 2011 13:42:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Test request: open-iscsi 2.0.872 |
Roy Bamford |
Sun, 05 Jun 2011 13:22:07 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Test request: open-iscsi 2.0.872 |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:58:11 |
| [gentoo-dev] Test request: open-iscsi 2.0.872 |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:55:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request) |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sun, 05 Jun 2011 08:59:00 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request) |
Fabian Groffen |
Sun, 05 Jun 2011 08:02:23 |
| [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-mail/gml |
Eray Aslan |
Sat, 04 Jun 2011 21:06:57 |
| [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-wireless/kbluetooth |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:06:17 |
| [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: sys-fs/evms |
Markos Chandras |
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:06:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:05:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:04:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:05:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
ross smith |
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:04:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:04:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
Patrick Lauer |
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:04:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:04:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:06:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
dev-random@××××.ru |
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:03:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: remove annoying "You should enable -g (or higher) for debugging!" message |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 07:06:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 07:05:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 01:03:39 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:09:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:08:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:08:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:08:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
Gökdeniz Karadağ |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:08:03 |
| [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar) |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:04:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs |
Rich Freeman |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:04:21 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request) |
Duncan |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:23:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request) |
Fabian Groffen |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:23:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request) |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:09:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:08:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs |
Patrick Lauer |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:08:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:08:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:07:49 |
| [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request) |
Fabian Groffen |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:12:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs |
Eray Aslan |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:04:27 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs |
Duncan |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:04:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtual default changes for old users, was: Heads up: libjpeg-turbo stabilization, becoming the default |
Zac Medico |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:04:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs |
Peter Volkov |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:04:24 |
| [gentoo-dev] Virtual default changes for old users, was: Heads up: libjpeg-turbo stabilization, becoming the default |
Christopher Head |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:04:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:05:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs |
Matt Turner |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:04:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:04:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs |
Dale |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:04:26 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:04:13 |
Archives