| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:35:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles |
Brian Harring |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:28:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants |
Markos Chandras |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:14:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:07:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles |
Brian Harring |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:54:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:42:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:53:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc: use iproute2 for all network handling in linux |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:09:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles |
Zac Medico |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:29:39 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:42:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:05:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles |
Alec Warner |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 17:05:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 17:01:39 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles |
Alec Warner |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:52:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:40:28 |
| [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:19:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/zlib: punt from system in profiles |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:18:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] News item for KDEPIM-4.7 stabilization |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:38:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] News item for KDEPIM-4.7 stabilization |
Ulrich Mueller |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:16:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] News item for KDEPIM-4.7 stabilization |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:36:24 |
| [gentoo-dev] lastrites: app-text/lyx2html (removal on 06 jan 2012) |
Alexis Ballier |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:21:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] News item for KDEPIM-4.7 stabilization |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:05:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sources.gentoo.org instability |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:21:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_MESSAGES=C again? |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:14:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] We need *you* for a USE="selinux" dependency |
Sven Vermeulen |
Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:43:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sources.gentoo.org instability |
Alec Warner |
Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:08:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] We need *you* for a USE="selinux" dependency |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:25:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] sources.gentoo.org instability |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:49:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] We need *you* for a USE="selinux" dependency |
Pacho Ramos |
Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:20:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] We need *you* for a USE="selinux" dependency |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:55:45 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: We need *you* for a USE="selinux" dependency |
Duncan |
Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:28:47 |
| [gentoo-dev] sources.gentoo.org instability |
Alec Warner |
Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:11:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] We need *you* for a USE="selinux" dependency |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 05 Dec 2011 03:11:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] We need *you* for a USE="selinux" dependency |
Brian Harring |
Mon, 05 Dec 2011 03:05:22 |
| [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2011-12-04 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:26:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] We need *you* for a USE="selinux" dependency |
Mike Frysinger |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 22:54:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] We need *you* for a USE="selinux" dependency |
Fabio Erculiani |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 22:12:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] user management mitigation |
Leho Kraav |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 22:10:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] We need *you* for a USE="selinux" dependency |
Petteri Räty |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:51:33 |
| [gentoo-dev] We need *you* for a USE="selinux" dependency |
Sven Vermeulen |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:37:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] dropping of ssp/pie support in <gcc-4 |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 19:47:38 |
| [gentoo-dev] dropping of ssp/pie support in <gcc-4 |
Mike Frysinger |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 19:34:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
Mike Frysinger |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 18:55:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
James Cloos |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 18:22:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] user management mitigation |
Zac Medico |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 17:57:54 |
| [gentoo-dev] News item for KDEPIM-4.7 stabilization |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 17:17:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] user management mitigation |
Mike Gilbert |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 17:13:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] user management mitigation |
Leho Kraav |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:45:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:27:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
James Broadhead |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:11:58 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
Ryan Hill |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 12:26:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_MESSAGES=C again? |
Rich Freeman |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 12:11:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 12:11:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
Rich Freeman |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 12:08:59 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 11:59:15 |
| [gentoo-dev] euscan-0.1.0 released |
Corentin Chary |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 09:42:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 08:31:47 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
Ryan Hill |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 08:06:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
Alexandre Rostovtsev |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 07:41:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
Jeroen Roovers |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 06:52:45 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
Ryan Hill |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 06:43:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_MESSAGES=C again? |
Jeroen Roovers |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 06:31:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_MESSAGES=C again? |
Alec Warner |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 06:15:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_MESSAGES=C again? |
Jeroen Roovers |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 06:05:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
Mike Frysinger |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 05:23:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
Alec Warner |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 04:16:38 |
| [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again? |
Jeroen Roovers |
Sun, 04 Dec 2011 03:51:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] user management mitigation |
Leho Kraav |
Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:53:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/pkgcore: pkgcore-0.7.7.1.ebuild ChangeLog pkgcore-0.7.6.1.ebuild pkgcore-0.7.7-r1.ebuild pkgcore-0.7.7.ebuild |
Brian Harring |
Sat, 03 Dec 2011 06:46:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/pkgcore: pkgcore-0.7.7.1.ebuild ChangeLog pkgcore-0.7.6.1.ebuild pkgcore-0.7.7-r1.ebuild pkgcore-0.7.7.ebuild |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sat, 03 Dec 2011 06:39:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/pkgcore: pkgcore-0.7.7.1.ebuild ChangeLog pkgcore-0.7.6.1.ebuild pkgcore-0.7.7-r1.ebuild pkgcore-0.7.7.ebuild |
Michał Górny |
Sat, 03 Dec 2011 06:29:26 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: filter-mfpmath: has Gentoo out grown it ? |
Ryan Hill |
Sat, 03 Dec 2011 05:28:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] filter-mfpmath: has Gentoo out grown it ? |
Mike Gilbert |
Sat, 03 Dec 2011 02:06:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/pkgcore: pkgcore-0.7.7.1.ebuild ChangeLog pkgcore-0.7.6.1.ebuild pkgcore-0.7.7-r1.ebuild pkgcore-0.7.7.ebuild |
Brian Harring |
Sat, 03 Dec 2011 02:05:54 |
| [gentoo-dev] New intltool in gentoo-x86 (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-util/intltool: ChangeLog intltool-0.50.0.ebuild) |
Samuli Suominen |
Sat, 03 Dec 2011 01:06:27 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/pkgcore: pkgcore-0.7.7.1.ebuild ChangeLog pkgcore-0.7.6.1.ebuild pkgcore-0.7.7-r1.ebuild pkgcore-0.7.7.ebuild |
Markos Chandras |
Sat, 03 Dec 2011 01:05:50 |
| [gentoo-dev] filter-mfpmath: has Gentoo out grown it ? |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:07:21 |
| [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: app-arch/squeeze (Part 1 of xfce-extra/thunar-vfs lastriting) |
Samuli Suominen |
Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:06:40 |
| [gentoo-dev] Last rites: llvm-gcc |
Bernard Cafarelli |
Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:06:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:07:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants |
Samuli Suominen |
Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:06:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:05:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Linking Stage, building a ebuild |
James Broadhead |
Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:51:38 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Bleeding edge hardened-sources: move PaX markings from ELF to Extended Attributes |
Duncan |
Fri, 02 Dec 2011 05:18:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Linking Stage, building a ebuild |
Nathan Phillip Brink |
Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:42:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Linking Stage, building a ebuild |
Brian Dolbec |
Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:36:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dragonheart retirement |
Nathan Phillip Brink |
Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:33:17 |
| [gentoo-dev] Linking Stage, building a ebuild |
Willian Vale da Rocha |
Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:23:23 |
| [gentoo-dev] Bleeding edge hardened-sources: move PaX markings from ELF to Extended Attributes |
Anthony G. Basile |
Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:09:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] contribution of ebuilds? Update for media-sound/darkice |
Niels Dettenbach |
Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:56:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] contribution of ebuilds? Update for media-sound/darkice |
Dale |
Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:45:33 |
| [gentoo-dev] contribution of ebuilds? Update for media-sound/darkice |
Niels Dettenbach |
Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:14:35 |
Archives