| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 1/2] Clarify wording for EAPI parsing |
Ulrich Mueller |
Thu, 17 May 2012 10:15:44 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] Re: EAPI 5 |
Zac Medico |
Sun, 13 May 2012 20:57:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 1/2] Clarify wording for EAPI parsing |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 13 May 2012 20:47:00 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 1/2] Clarify wording for EAPI parsing |
David Leverton |
Sun, 13 May 2012 19:41:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 1/2] Clarify wording for EAPI parsing |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 13 May 2012 19:35:59 |
| [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 2/2] Require a space before the trailing comment |
David Leverton |
Sun, 13 May 2012 19:13:29 |
| [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 1/2] Clarify wording for EAPI parsing |
David Leverton |
Sun, 13 May 2012 19:12:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 13 May 2012 19:00:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds |
David Leverton |
Sun, 13 May 2012 18:23:34 |
| [gentoo-pms] S to WORKDIR fallback in src_test() |
Ulrich Mueller |
Fri, 11 May 2012 18:37:30 |
| [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] src_test really calls emake -j1, not make. |
Ulrich Mueller |
Fri, 11 May 2012 15:59:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 development branch |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 10 May 2012 15:07:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 development branch |
Ulrich Mueller |
Thu, 10 May 2012 14:38:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 development branch |
Zac Medico |
Thu, 10 May 2012 14:20:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 development branch |
Ulrich Mueller |
Thu, 10 May 2012 09:56:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 development branch |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 10 May 2012 09:22:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 development branch |
Ulrich Mueller |
Thu, 10 May 2012 09:04:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] apply_user_patches |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 07 May 2012 18:26:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] apply_user_patches |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 07 May 2012 18:16:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] apply_user_patches |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 07 May 2012 16:49:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] apply_user_patches |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 07 May 2012 16:41:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] apply_user_patches (was: EAPI 5 development branch) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 07 May 2012 16:31:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] apply_user_patches |
Michael Orlitzky |
Mon, 07 May 2012 16:19:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] apply_user_patches (was: EAPI 5 development branch) |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 07 May 2012 15:17:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] apply_user_patches (was: EAPI 5 development branch) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 07 May 2012 13:01:13 |
| [gentoo-pms] apply_user_patches (was: EAPI 5 development branch) |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 07 May 2012 00:12:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] How about a \ChangeWhenAddingAnEAPI marker? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 06 May 2012 22:50:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] How about a \ChangeWhenAddingAnEAPI marker? |
Brian Harring |
Sun, 06 May 2012 22:33:34 |
| [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 development branch |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 06 May 2012 20:46:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] The "Feature Availability by EAPI" table is ugly |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 06 May 2012 20:19:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] How about a \ChangeWhenAddingAnEAPI marker? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 06 May 2012 19:45:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] How about a \ChangeWhenAddingAnEAPI marker? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 06 May 2012 19:40:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5? |
Tiziano Müller |
Sun, 06 May 2012 18:34:00 |
| [gentoo-pms] Should epatch be moved into EAPI 5? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 06 May 2012 17:18:52 |
| [gentoo-pms] The "Feature Availability by EAPI" table is uglier than Portage code |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 06 May 2012 16:28:58 |
| [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] How about a \ChangeWhenAddingAnEAPI marker? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 06 May 2012 15:36:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 06 May 2012 14:23:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 06 May 2012 09:18:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 06 May 2012 09:11:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sun, 06 May 2012 03:19:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5 |
Ulrich Mueller |
Wed, 02 May 2012 17:41:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] Re: EAPI 5 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Tue, 01 May 2012 12:10:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] Re: EAPI 5 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 01 May 2012 09:19:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] Re: EAPI 5 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Tue, 01 May 2012 09:01:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] Re: EAPI 5 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 01 May 2012 08:41:25 |
Archives