Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt5-build.eclass |
hasufell |
Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:27:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt5-build.eclass |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 20 Aug 2014 08:06:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: reviewboard and its bugs |
Tim Boudreau |
Wed, 20 Aug 2014 03:51:17 |
Re: tl;dr: [gentoo-dev] Fw: reviewboard and its bugs |
Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) |
Wed, 20 Aug 2014 03:38:02 |
tl;dr: [gentoo-dev] Fw: reviewboard and its bugs |
Alex Xu |
Wed, 20 Aug 2014 01:38:43 |
[gentoo-dev] Fw: reviewboard and its bugs |
IAN DELANEY |
Wed, 20 Aug 2014 01:08:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Followup notes: {cvs,git,git.overlays}.gentoo.org migration; awol: some overlays commits, gitweb |
Brian Dolbec |
Tue, 19 Aug 2014 21:52:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Followup notes: {cvs,git,git.overlays}.gentoo.org migration; awol: some overlays commits, gitweb |
hasufell |
Tue, 19 Aug 2014 21:19:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Followup notes: {cvs,git,git.overlays}.gentoo.org migration; awol: some overlays commits, gitweb |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:51:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Followup notes: {cvs,git,git.overlays}.gentoo.org migration; awol: some overlays commits, gitweb |
hasufell |
Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:47:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] cvs.gentoo.org, git.gentoo.org, *.overlays.gentoo.org migration timeline & ssh keys |
Alex Legler |
Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:50:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] cvs.gentoo.org, git.gentoo.org, *.overlays.gentoo.org migration timeline & ssh keys |
Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov |
Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:19:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Followup notes: {cvs,git,git.overlays}.gentoo.org migration; awol: some overlays commits, gitweb |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:22:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Followup notes: {cvs,git,git.overlays}.gentoo.org migration; awol: some overlays commits, gitweb |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:11:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/amara |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:41:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Sergey Popov |
Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:02:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Sergey Popov |
Tue, 19 Aug 2014 06:58:31 |
[gentoo-dev] Followup notes: {cvs,git,git.overlays}.gentoo.org migration; awol: some overlays commits, gitweb |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:00:27 |
[gentoo-dev] Initial (partial) EAPI6 implementation for Portage |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 21:09:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
hasufell |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:23:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:08:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Chris Reffett |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 19:37:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 15:11:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 14:13:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings |
Ben de Groot |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 14:10:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
hasufell |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:28:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:27:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Chris Reffett |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:23:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: eclass issues |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:18:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
hasufell |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:56:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:52:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
hasufell |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:42:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
hasufell |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:30:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Sergey Popov |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:21:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Sergey Popov |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:19:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: eclass issues |
hasufell |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:12:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
hasufell |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:05:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:45:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-08-10 23h59 UTC |
Sergey Popov |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:55:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Sergey Popov |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:54:38 |
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-08-17 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:25:17 |
[gentoo-dev] Bits 55-60 of /proc/PID/pagemap entries are about to stop being page-shift some time soon ? |
Joshua Kinard |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 21:41:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of ppc and ppc64 teams. |
Anthony G. Basile |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 20:46:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt5-build.eclass |
Davide Pesavento |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 19:13:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt5-build.eclass |
Georg Rudoy |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 19:09:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt5-build.eclass |
Maxim Koltsov |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:57:01 |
[gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt5-build.eclass |
Davide Pesavento |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:38:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: eclass issues |
Rich Freeman |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 17:29:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-4.8 may be needed in stable for www-client/chromium-38.x |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 16:32:15 |
[gentoo-dev] rfc: eclass issues |
William Hubbs |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:39:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Rich Freeman |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 12:24:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Kent Fredric |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 08:49:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 07:24:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 07:17:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 07:06:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 07:04:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 06:54:26 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Duncan |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 03:11:40 |
[gentoo-dev] New layman features |
Devan Franchini |
Sun, 17 Aug 2014 02:29:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
William Hubbs |
Sat, 16 Aug 2014 23:30:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
William Hubbs |
Sat, 16 Aug 2014 23:01:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Michał Górny |
Sat, 16 Aug 2014 22:53:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
Kent Fredric |
Sat, 16 Aug 2014 22:32:22 |
[gentoo-dev] rfc: calling all eclass phase functions by default |
William Hubbs |
Sat, 16 Aug 2014 21:54:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of ppc and ppc64 teams. |
Pacho Ramos |
Sat, 16 Aug 2014 09:32:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: mysql-5.5 upgrade and mysql-5.1 mask news item |
Brian Evans |
Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:59:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: mysql-5.5 upgrade and mysql-5.1 mask news item |
Manuel Rüger |
Thu, 14 Aug 2014 20:47:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: mysql-5.5 upgrade and mysql-5.1 mask news item |
Tom Wijsman |
Thu, 14 Aug 2014 20:14:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: mysql-5.5 upgrade and mysql-5.1 mask news item |
Brian Evans |
Thu, 14 Aug 2014 20:09:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: mysql-5.5 upgrade and mysql-5.1 mask news item |
Maxim Koltsov |
Thu, 14 Aug 2014 20:03:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: mysql-5.5 upgrade and mysql-5.1 mask news item |
Maxim Koltsov |
Thu, 14 Aug 2014 20:03:26 |
[gentoo-dev] RFC: mysql-5.5 upgrade and mysql-5.1 mask news item |
Brian Evans |
Thu, 14 Aug 2014 19:58:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new set of profiles/default/linux/uclibc |
Richard Yao |
Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:43:47 |
[gentoo-dev] RFC: new set of profiles/default/linux/uclibc |
Anthony G. Basile |
Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:02:14 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings |
Duncan |
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:36:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] minimalistic emerge |
hasufell |
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:18:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings ) |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:48:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:38:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] minimalistic emerge |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:25:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] minimalistic emerge |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:21:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] minimalistic emerge |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:13:48 |
[OT] Re: [gentoo-dev] minimalistic emerge |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 07:54:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/x265: x265-1.0.ebuild ChangeLog x265-1.2.ebuild x265-0.8.ebuild |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 07:04:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Clarifying if some arch teams allows maintainers to stabilize package on arches they can test |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 06:58:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 22:11:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings |
Alexander Berntsen |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 22:00:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:49:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:32:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings |
hasufell |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:08:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings ) |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:11:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings ) |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:00:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 18:45:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings |
Chris Reffett |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 18:38:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 18:31:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings ) |
William Hubbs |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:46:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings ) |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:25:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings ) |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:13:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings ) |
hasufell |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:08:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings ) |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:57:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings ) |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:36:18 |