Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager |
Michael Haubenwallner |
Sat, 07 May 2005 11:06:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager |
Marius Mauch |
Sat, 07 May 2005 10:53:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: Duncan Coutts (dcoutts) |
Tom Martin |
Sat, 07 May 2005 08:53:26 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: Duncan Coutts (dcoutts) |
Duncan |
Sat, 07 May 2005 07:54:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager |
Brian Harring |
Sat, 07 May 2005 07:08:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/libintl and virtual/iconv |
Jason Stubbs |
Sat, 07 May 2005 01:59:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 07 May 2005 01:35:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager |
Brian Harring |
Sat, 07 May 2005 01:07:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager |
Brian Harring |
Sat, 07 May 2005 01:05:01 |
[gentoo-dev] new devrel ops lead |
Deedra Waters |
Sat, 07 May 2005 00:53:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/libintl and virtual/iconv |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò |
Fri, 06 May 2005 23:41:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/libintl and virtual/iconv |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 06 May 2005 23:38:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/libintl and virtual/iconv |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 06 May 2005 23:29:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/libintl and virtual/iconv |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò |
Fri, 06 May 2005 23:18:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/libintl and virtual/iconv |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 06 May 2005 23:05:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/libintl and virtual/iconv |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò |
Fri, 06 May 2005 23:02:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/libintl and virtual/iconv |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò |
Fri, 06 May 2005 22:59:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/libintl and virtual/iconv |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 06 May 2005 22:45:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/libintl and virtual/iconv |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 06 May 2005 22:44:11 |
[gentoo-dev] virtual/libintl and virtual/iconv |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò |
Fri, 06 May 2005 22:35:09 |
[gentoo-dev] New Developer: Duncan Coutts (dcoutts) |
Tom Martin |
Fri, 06 May 2005 22:23:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs => dev-cpp moves |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò |
Fri, 06 May 2005 21:15:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy on RESTRICT=[no]mirror and use of mirror://foo/ |
Chris Gianelloni |
Fri, 06 May 2005 21:08:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs => dev-cpp moves |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 06 May 2005 20:55:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs => dev-cpp moves |
Alin Nastac |
Fri, 06 May 2005 19:37:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs => dev-cpp moves |
Mark Loeser |
Fri, 06 May 2005 16:29:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs => dev-cpp moves |
Donnie Berkholz |
Fri, 06 May 2005 16:20:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs => dev-cpp moves |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò |
Fri, 06 May 2005 15:46:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs => dev-cpp moves |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 06 May 2005 15:36:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs => dev-cpp moves |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò |
Fri, 06 May 2005 15:27:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs => dev-cpp moves |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 06 May 2005 15:17:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs => dev-cpp moves |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 06 May 2005 15:15:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs => dev-cpp moves |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò |
Fri, 06 May 2005 15:07:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs => dev-cpp moves |
Alin Nastac |
Fri, 06 May 2005 15:06:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs => dev-cpp moves |
Donnie Berkholz |
Fri, 06 May 2005 14:33:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 06 May 2005 13:24:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager |
Brian Jackson |
Fri, 06 May 2005 13:08:30 |
[gentoo-dev] Splitting up dev-perl (phase one of a million) |
Michael Cummings |
Fri, 06 May 2005 12:27:08 |
[gentoo-dev] dev-libs => dev-cpp moves |
Aaron Walker |
Fri, 06 May 2005 11:40:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy on RESTRICT=[no]mirror and use of mirror://foo/ |
Brian Harring |
Fri, 06 May 2005 06:06:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy on RESTRICT=[no]mirror and use of mirror://foo/ |
Robin H. Johnson |
Fri, 06 May 2005 05:53:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager |
Brian Harring |
Fri, 06 May 2005 05:09:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy on RESTRICT=[no]mirror and use of mirror://foo/ |
Alin Nastac |
Fri, 06 May 2005 04:37:10 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: emerge |
Duncan |
Fri, 06 May 2005 03:30:56 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: emerge |
R Hill |
Fri, 06 May 2005 03:01:07 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: emerge |
Duncan |
Fri, 06 May 2005 02:50:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge |
Daniel Gryniewicz |
Fri, 06 May 2005 02:38:46 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Some new xorg ebuilds |
Duncan |
Fri, 06 May 2005 02:28:21 |
[gentoo-dev] emerge |
Dulmandakh Sukhbaatar |
Fri, 06 May 2005 01:29:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy on RESTRICT=[no]mirror and use of mirror://foo/ |
Lance Albertson |
Thu, 05 May 2005 22:23:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy on RESTRICT=[no]mirror and use of mirror://foo/ |
Corey Shields |
Thu, 05 May 2005 22:19:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy on RESTRICT=[no]mirror and use of mirror://foo/ |
Lance Albertson |
Thu, 05 May 2005 22:06:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy on RESTRICT=[no]mirror and use of mirror://foo/ |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 05 May 2005 21:59:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy on RESTRICT=[no]mirror and use of mirror://foo/ |
Corey Shields |
Thu, 05 May 2005 21:27:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy on RESTRICT=[no]mirror and use of mirror://foo/ |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 05 May 2005 21:16:10 |
[gentoo-dev] Policy on RESTRICT=[no]mirror and use of mirror://foo/ |
Robin H. Johnson |
Thu, 05 May 2005 21:04:14 |
[gentoo-dev] Sparc development netra going away |
Josh Grebe |
Thu, 05 May 2005 20:38:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] module-rebuild |
Thomas de Grenier de Latour |
Thu, 05 May 2005 15:33:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Some new xorg ebuilds |
Donnie Berkholz |
Thu, 05 May 2005 15:20:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 05 May 2005 14:12:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 05 May 2005 14:01:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gluelog ebuild? |
Chris Gianelloni |
Thu, 05 May 2005 11:50:54 |
[gentoo-dev] Bugday reminder |
Bryan Oestergaard |
Thu, 05 May 2005 11:22:07 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Some new xorg ebuilds |
Duncan |
Thu, 05 May 2005 10:12:10 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-server] gluelog ebuild? |
Casey Allen Shobe - SeattleServer Mailing Lists |
Thu, 05 May 2005 09:24:58 |
[gentoo-dev] gluelog ebuild? |
Casey Allen Shobe - SeattleServer Mailing Lists |
Thu, 05 May 2005 09:13:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager |
Brian Harring |
Thu, 05 May 2005 08:55:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager |
Brian Harring |
Thu, 05 May 2005 08:48:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] OffTopic: VMWare ESX |
Donnie Berkholz |
Thu, 05 May 2005 03:25:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] OffTopic: VMWare ESX |
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky |
Thu, 05 May 2005 03:21:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: emerge-webrsync bandwidth improvement |
Brian Harring |
Thu, 05 May 2005 03:02:28 |
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] OffTopic: VMWare ESX |
Matthew Marlowe |
Thu, 05 May 2005 02:29:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Chris Gianelloni |
Thu, 05 May 2005 01:35:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Michiel de Bruijne |
Thu, 05 May 2005 01:28:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Wed, 04 May 2005 23:15:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
David Krider |
Wed, 04 May 2005 22:57:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] OffTopic: VMWare ESX |
John Mylchreest |
Wed, 04 May 2005 21:42:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] OffTopic: VMWare ESX |
Jan Kundrát |
Wed, 04 May 2005 21:37:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] OffTopic: VMWare ESX |
John Mylchreest |
Wed, 04 May 2005 21:16:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Ryan |
Wed, 04 May 2005 20:25:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] OffTopic: VMWare ESX |
DK Smith |
Wed, 04 May 2005 19:55:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] OffTopic: VMWare ESX |
Omkhar Arasaratnam |
Wed, 04 May 2005 19:12:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some new xorg ebuilds |
Donnie Berkholz |
Wed, 04 May 2005 19:03:21 |
[gentoo-dev] OffTopic: VMWare ESX |
John Mylchreest |
Wed, 04 May 2005 18:24:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Wed, 04 May 2005 16:55:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Lance Albertson |
Wed, 04 May 2005 16:46:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Wed, 04 May 2005 16:27:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Michiel de Bruijne |
Wed, 04 May 2005 16:17:46 |
Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Brett Curtis |
Wed, 04 May 2005 15:36:36 |
Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky |
Wed, 04 May 2005 14:38:58 |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky |
Wed, 04 May 2005 14:35:02 |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Omkhar Arasaratnam |
Wed, 04 May 2005 14:28:31 |
Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Michael Cummings |
Wed, 04 May 2005 14:24:00 |
Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Brett Curtis |
Wed, 04 May 2005 14:18:30 |
Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
daniel.kerwin@×××××××.de |
Wed, 04 May 2005 14:12:29 |
Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Omkhar Arasaratnam |
Wed, 04 May 2005 14:08:55 |
Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 04 May 2005 14:07:33 |
Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky |
Wed, 04 May 2005 13:50:37 |
Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Daniel Ostrow |
Wed, 04 May 2005 13:49:27 |
Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware |
Omkhar Arasaratnam |
Wed, 04 May 2005 13:32:24 |