| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How to install two differents versions of gcc ? |
fede2@fuerzag.ulatina.ac.cr (Alvaro Figueroa Cabezas) |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:59:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Messages while unmerging packages |
Gustavo Adolfo Silva Ribeiro Felisberto |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:37:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Genkernel hacking |
Robin H. Johnson |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:17:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] portage changelog |
Markus Nigbur |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 13:51:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Messages while unmerging packages |
Paul de Vrieze |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 10:59:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Messages while unmerging packages |
Chris Gianelloni |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 10:13:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Genkernel hacking |
Chris Gianelloni |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 10:12:18 |
| [gentoo-dev] Messages while unmerging packages |
Gustavo Adolfo Silva Ribeiro Felisberto |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:56:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Enemy Territory Strikes Back |
Chris Gianelloni |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:37:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Genkernel hacking |
Robin H. Johnson |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:31:25 |
| [gentoo-dev] Gentoo live-cd distro |
Alberto Romero |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:09:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo volenteers to help with linuxabi |
Kumba |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 05:10:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How to install two differents versions of gcc ? |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 02:44:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Enemy Territory Strikes Back |
Brett I. Holcomb |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 02:14:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Enemy Territory Strikes Back |
Chris Gianelloni |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 01:27:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Chris Gianelloni |
Thu, 09 Oct 2003 00:50:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How to install two differents versions of gcc ? |
fede2@g.o |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:07:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How to install two differents versions of gcc ? |
Stanislav Brabec |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 20:57:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] portage changelog |
Andrei Ivanov |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 20:24:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] portage changelog |
Andrei Ivanov |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 20:22:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] portage changelog |
Robin H. Johnson |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 20:22:00 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] portage changelog |
Lisa Seelye |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 20:13:07 |
| [gentoo-dev] portage changelog |
Andrei Ivanov |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 19:47:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How to install two differents versions of gcc ? |
Kumba |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 19:32:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How to install two differents versions of gcc ? |
Kumba |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 19:30:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Enemy Territory Strikes Back |
Dhruba Bandopadhyay |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 17:28:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How to install two differents versions of gcc ? |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 16:25:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How to install two differents versions of gcc ? |
chomats |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 16:09:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How to install two differents versions of gcc ? |
Andrew Gaffney |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 15:55:47 |
| [gentoo-dev] How to install two differents versions of gcc ? |
chomats |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 15:49:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unable to emerge -up world for 22 days and counting |
Stuart Bouyer |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 15:23:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unable to emerge -up world for 22 days and counting |
Stuart Bouyer |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 15:09:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unable to emerge -up world for 22 days and counting |
Alastair Tse |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 15:01:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] unable to emerge -up world for 22 days and counting |
Jon Portnoy |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:52:30 |
| [gentoo-dev] unable to emerge -up world for 22 days and counting |
Stuart Bouyer |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:44:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Enemy Territory Strikes Back |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:16:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Enemy Territory Strikes Back |
Jason Stubbs |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:00:00 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Enemy Territory Strikes Back |
Chris Bainbridge |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 13:42:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Request for testing: dev-util/eclipse-sdk-2.1.1 |
Paul de Vrieze |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 13:01:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Enemy Territory Strikes Back |
Jason Stubbs |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:36:37 |
| [gentoo-dev] Enemy Territory Strikes Back |
Dhruba Bandopadhyay |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:21:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Paul de Vrieze |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 09:21:44 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] tnftp needs non-x86 testing |
Jason Wever |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 08:58:53 |
| [gentoo-dev] gentoo presentation in boston, ma, usa |
Rajiv Aaron Manglani |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 07:33:08 |
| [gentoo-dev] app-misc/screen bump, alpha patch? |
Donnie Berkholz |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 04:15:43 |
| [gentoo-dev] tnftp needs non-x86 testing |
Grant Goodyear |
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 01:22:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Spider |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:42:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Lars Weiler |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:34:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Chris Gianelloni |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:19:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Spider |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:19:31 |
| [gentoo-dev] Implementing GLEP #11: webapp.eclass rev1 available for review |
Stuart Herbert |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:17:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Mike Williams |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:11:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Three teir portage: stable, prestable, unstable? |
Jason Stubbs |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:10:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Spider |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:50:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
Markus Nigbur |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:46:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Three teir portage: stable, prestable, unstable? |
foser |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:43:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
Florian Schneider |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:23:59 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
John Mylchreest |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:17:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
Peter Ruskin |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:15:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
Florian Schneider |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:10:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
Andrew Gaffney |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:00:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
John Mylchreest |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:52:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
John Mylchreest |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:48:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
Lisa Seelye |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:46:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
Florian Schneider |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:42:02 |
| [gentoo-dev] testing, please ignore. my appologies |
John Mylchreest |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:27:17 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:24:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
Andrew Gaffney |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:19:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:09:19 |
| RE: [gentoo-dev] coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
John Mylchreest |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:05:58 |
| RE: [gentoo-dev] coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
Jeffrey Smelser |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:00:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
Florian Schneider |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 19:59:01 |
| RE: [gentoo-dev] coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
Jeffrey Smelser |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 19:48:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Alan |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 19:47:04 |
| [gentoo-dev] coreutils >=5.0.1 breaks chown user.group on new systems |
Florian Schneider |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 19:39:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Chris Gianelloni |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 19:37:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] devfs dependancy |
splite-gentoo@××××××××××××××××.edu |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 18:46:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Three teir portage: stable, prestable, unstable? |
Paul de Vrieze |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 18:27:59 |
| [gentoo-dev] Gentoo volenteers to help with linuxabi |
Martin Schlemmer |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 18:24:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Three teir portage: stable, prestable, unstable? |
brett holcomb |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 18:10:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Spider |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:49:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Three teir portage: stable, prestable, unstable? |
Ian Leitch |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:49:00 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Spider |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:33:39 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: LJ #114 (2) |
Martin Schlemmer |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:30:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] devfs dependancy |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:50:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] devfs dependancy |
Brian Jackson |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:44:15 |
| [gentoo-dev] devfs dependancy |
Chris Sykes |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:16:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Three teir portage: stable, prestable, unstable? |
foser |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 14:32:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Sami Näätänen |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:09:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Three teir portage: stable, prestable, unstable? |
Paul de Vrieze |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:04:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Three teir portage: stable, prestable, unstable? |
foser |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 12:09:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] About cloop version |
Stuart Herbert |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 11:59:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Paul de Vrieze |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 11:34:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Chris Gianelloni |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 11:14:42 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: About cloop version |
Alberto Romero |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 10:58:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Three teir portage: stable, prestable, unstable? |
Paul de Vrieze |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 09:46:06 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] location for binary package files (when vendors don't provide them) |
Paul de Vrieze |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 09:29:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Paul de Vrieze |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 09:18:33 |
| [gentoo-dev] About cloop version |
Alberto Romero |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 08:14:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86 |
Spider |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 05:37:30 |
Archives