Subject |
From |
Date |
[gentoo-dev] perl-5.10.1 status update |
Torsten Veller |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:31:13 |
[gentoo-dev] perl-module.class review |
Torsten Veller |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:30:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:25:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:55:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:47:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:32:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:30:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:25:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:23:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Petteri Räty |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:10:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Robert Buchholz |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:52:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:05:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:56:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:44:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Jesús Guerrero |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:29:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:23:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Dale |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:17:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Jesús Guerrero |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:53:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Dale |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:51:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Jesús Guerrero |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:50:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Francesco R |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:46:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Jesús Guerrero |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:44:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Jesús Guerrero |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:44:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI and system packages |
Patrick Lauer |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:07:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI and system packages |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:53:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI and system packages |
Richard Freeman |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:28:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Richard Freeman |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:19:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI and system packages |
Alexis Ballier |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:47:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI and system packages |
Petteri Räty |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:37:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Petteri Räty |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:35:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI and system packages |
Alexey Shvetsov |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:56:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI and system packages |
Rémi Cardona |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:48:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Alistair Bush |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:42:25 |
[gentoo-dev] EAPI and system packages |
Ryan Hill |
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:31:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Francesco R |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 23:45:39 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Ryan Hill |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 23:31:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Alex Alexander |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 23:29:35 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Mark Bateman |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:53:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Dawid Węgliński |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:41:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Dale |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:32:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Alistair Bush |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:55:09 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Ryan Hill |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:47:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Robert Bridge |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:21:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Petteri Räty |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:51:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:40:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Mark Loeser |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:35:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:57:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:50:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:49:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:45:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
AllenJB |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:24:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Tobias Klausmann |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:22:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
AllenJB |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:20:19 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Nikos Chantziaras |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:33:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Olivier Crête |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:28:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Alex Legler |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:27:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Dale |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:21:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:09:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Alex Legler |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:07:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:53:37 |
[gentoo-dev] Stabilization of Python 3.1 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:46:25 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rite: media-libs/mlt++ (removal due 19 Oct 2009) |
Alexis Ballier |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:42:46 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-desktop] KDE Team Meeting - September 2009 |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:55:14 |
[gentoo-dev] KDE Team Meeting - September 2009 |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:59:25 |
[gentoo-dev] last rites for app-accessibility/at-poke |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:42:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] |
Zac Medico |
Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:21:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] |
Sebastian Pipping |
Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:31:12 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Add "as-is" to @GPL-COMPATIBLE licence group |
Ulrich Mueller |
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:59:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] |
Zac Medico |
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:03:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:52:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] |
Sebastian Pipping |
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:28:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:05:55 |
[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for app-forensics/pyflag |
Diego E. Pettenò |
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:23:57 |
[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for <app-i18n/dbskkd-cdb-2; app-i18n/skk-jisyo-cdb; app-i18n/skk-jisyo-extra |
Diego E. Pettenò |
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:17:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman complains about a ebuild in the tree |
Andrey Grozin |
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:26:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman complains about a ebuild in the tree |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:35:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman complains about a ebuild in the tree |
Andrey Grozin |
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:56:36 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future |
Ryan Hill |
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:46:35 |
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2009-09-13 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:15:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future |
Dale |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:06:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future |
Alex Legler |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:55:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman complains about a ebuild in the tree |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:14:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future |
Dale |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:08:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future |
Alex Legler |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:54:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future |
Dale |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:25:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:17:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] |
Jesús Guerrero |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:04:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:03:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] |
Alexander Færøy |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:00:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:00:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:52:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:46:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] |
Patrick Lauer |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:41:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:39:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:38:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] |
Alexander Færøy |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:30:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] |
Jesús Guerrero |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:03:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] |
Patrick Lauer |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:57:51 |
[gentoo-dev] repoman complains about a ebuild in the tree |
Andrey Grozin |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:47:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future |
Dale |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:45:56 |