Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev in April 2006

Subject From Date
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code Donnie Berkholz Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:42:26
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code m h Sun, 30 Apr 2006 20:50:45
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Breakout etc-update, dispatch-conf Simon Stelling Sun, 30 Apr 2006 20:32:49
[gentoo-portage-dev] Breakout etc-update, dispatch-conf Alec Warner Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:51:22
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code Alec Warner Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:42:39
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code m h Sun, 30 Apr 2006 05:59:07
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code Alec Warner Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:54:57
[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code m h Sun, 30 Apr 2006 00:16:17
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node Brian Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:33:08
[gentoo-portage-dev] Refactoring of emerge code m h Sat, 29 Apr 2006 06:57:20
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge threaded Brian Harring Tue, 25 Apr 2006 03:15:47
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge threaded Brian Tue, 25 Apr 2006 02:53:29
[gentoo-portage-dev] emerge threaded Tom Hosiawa Tue, 25 Apr 2006 02:10:28
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] glsa implemented as a special set Ned Ludd Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:31:37
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] glsa implemented as a special set Marius Mauch Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:15:08
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] glsa implemented as a special set Brian Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:02:47
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] glsa implemented as a special set Marius Mauch Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:19:57
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] QA Notice: ECLASS 'foo' inherited illegally Brian Harring Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:38:41
[gentoo-portage-dev] QA Notice: ECLASS 'foo' inherited illegally Duncan Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:11:47
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: r3200 - main/trunk/bin Mike Frysinger Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:43:30
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage Tom Hosiawa Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:23:17
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: r3200 - main/trunk/bin Alec Warner Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:09:26
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage Brian Mon, 24 Apr 2006 04:30:25
[gentoo-portage-dev] portage Tom Hosiawa Mon, 24 Apr 2006 03:05:45
[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: r3200 - main/trunk/bin Mike Frysinger Mon, 24 Apr 2006 02:28:28
[gentoo-portage-dev] glsa implemented as a special set Brian Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:53:49
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] efficient source for changes in the portage tree Björn Ruberg Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:35:48
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] efficient source for changes in the portage tree Brian Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:12:45
[gentoo-portage-dev] efficient source for changes in the portage tree Björn Ruberg Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:32:49
Portage Features That Depend on Binaries [WAS: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? ] Alec Warner Thu, 20 Apr 2006 03:28:18
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? Philipp Riegger Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:52:58
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] accessing portage updates through it's data structures Tom Hosiawa Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:45:43
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] accessing portage updates through it's data structures Tom Hosiawa Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:18:12
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] accessing portage updates through it's data structures Tom Hosiawa Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:06:28
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] accessing portage updates through it's data structures Jason Stubbs Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:58:58
[gentoo-portage-dev] accessing portage updates through it's data structures Tom Hosiawa Tue, 18 Apr 2006 04:20:26
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Outstanding decisions Alec Warner Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:53:00
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Outstanding decisions Simon Stelling Sun, 16 Apr 2006 22:15:46
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Outstanding decisions Alec Warner Sun, 16 Apr 2006 18:30:55
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Outstanding decisions Mike Frysinger Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:51:05
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: generating ._cfg0000_foo multiple times between --sync Michiel de Bruijne Sat, 15 Apr 2006 23:44:38
[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: generating ._cfg0000_foo multiple times between --sync Duncan Sat, 15 Apr 2006 16:51:39
[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? Duncan Sat, 15 Apr 2006 16:15:46
[gentoo-portage-dev] Outstanding decisions Simon Stelling Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:51:29
[gentoo-portage-dev] generating ._cfg0000_foo multiple times between --sync Michiel de Bruijne Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:08:09
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? Philipp Riegger Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:12:37
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Zac Medico Sat, 15 Apr 2006 07:12:34
[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? Duncan Sat, 15 Apr 2006 06:40:49
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Brian Harring Sat, 15 Apr 2006 02:35:53
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Jason Stubbs Sat, 15 Apr 2006 02:08:45
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Jason Stubbs Sat, 15 Apr 2006 01:56:57
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Jason Stubbs Sat, 15 Apr 2006 01:56:10
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Brian Harring Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:32:00
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Alec Warner Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:10:51
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Brian Harring Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:22:28
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Philipp Riegger Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:16:06
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? Jason Stubbs Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:45:52
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? Zac Medico Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:36:09
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? Zac Medico Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:29:19
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? Mike Frysinger Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:41:17
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Jason Stubbs Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:12:28
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? Ned Ludd Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:08:59
[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? Duncan Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:05:33
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? Simon Stelling Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:54:10
[gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? Zac Medico Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:25:13
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] intrusive spring cleaning/sanitizing Brian Harring Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:53:10
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] spring cleaning. Brian Harring Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:51:27
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] spring cleaning. Mark Pagano Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:40:45
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node Brian Sun, 09 Apr 2006 19:33:49
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node Zac Medico Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:42:38
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node Brian Sun, 09 Apr 2006 17:41:14
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node Zac Medico Sun, 09 Apr 2006 17:27:25
[gentoo-portage-dev] intrusive spring cleaning/sanitizing Brian Harring Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:27:41
[gentoo-portage-dev] spring cleaning. Brian Harring Sun, 09 Apr 2006 12:20:54
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node Simon Stelling Sun, 09 Apr 2006 11:08:45
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node Donnie Berkholz Sun, 09 Apr 2006 10:43:30
[gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node Eldad Zack Sun, 09 Apr 2006 09:43:10
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Ned Ludd Sat, 08 Apr 2006 12:49:29
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Ned Ludd Sat, 08 Apr 2006 12:47:36
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Donnie Berkholz Sat, 08 Apr 2006 07:39:42
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Jason Stubbs Sat, 08 Apr 2006 02:18:46
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Zac Medico Sat, 08 Apr 2006 01:39:32
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Ned Ludd Fri, 07 Apr 2006 22:36:10
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Zac Medico Fri, 07 Apr 2006 21:54:01
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? solar Fri, 07 Apr 2006 18:20:04
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Alec Warner Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:26:47
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Jason Stubbs Fri, 07 Apr 2006 12:06:38
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Ned Ludd Fri, 07 Apr 2006 11:54:18
Re: [Fwd: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon?] Zac Medico Fri, 07 Apr 2006 06:52:34
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Zac Medico Fri, 07 Apr 2006 06:37:02
[Fwd: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon?] Alec Warner Fri, 07 Apr 2006 05:09:32
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Brian Harring Fri, 07 Apr 2006 05:01:50
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Marius Mauch Fri, 07 Apr 2006 03:12:49
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Zac Medico Fri, 07 Apr 2006 02:12:05
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Marius Mauch Thu, 06 Apr 2006 23:01:12
[gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Zac Medico Thu, 06 Apr 2006 20:14:17
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] rewriting the ldconfig logic Zac Medico Wed, 05 Apr 2006 01:24:43
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Repoman Help Extraction Marius Mauch Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:34:56
[gentoo-portage-dev] Repoman Help Extraction Alec Warner Tue, 04 Apr 2006 01:13:52
[gentoo-portage-dev] Pychecker Alec Warner Mon, 03 Apr 2006 06:04:24