Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code |
Donnie Berkholz |
Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:42:26 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code |
m h |
Sun, 30 Apr 2006 20:50:45 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Breakout etc-update, dispatch-conf |
Simon Stelling |
Sun, 30 Apr 2006 20:32:49 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] Breakout etc-update, dispatch-conf |
Alec Warner |
Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:51:22 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code |
Alec Warner |
Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:42:39 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code |
m h |
Sun, 30 Apr 2006 05:59:07 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code |
Alec Warner |
Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:54:57 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code |
m h |
Sun, 30 Apr 2006 00:16:17 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node |
Brian |
Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:33:08 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] Refactoring of emerge code |
m h |
Sat, 29 Apr 2006 06:57:20 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge threaded |
Brian Harring |
Tue, 25 Apr 2006 03:15:47 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge threaded |
Brian |
Tue, 25 Apr 2006 02:53:29 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] emerge threaded |
Tom Hosiawa |
Tue, 25 Apr 2006 02:10:28 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] glsa implemented as a special set |
Ned Ludd |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:31:37 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] glsa implemented as a special set |
Marius Mauch |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:15:08 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] glsa implemented as a special set |
Brian |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:02:47 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] glsa implemented as a special set |
Marius Mauch |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:19:57 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] QA Notice: ECLASS 'foo' inherited illegally |
Brian Harring |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:38:41 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] QA Notice: ECLASS 'foo' inherited illegally |
Duncan |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:11:47 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: r3200 - main/trunk/bin |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:43:30 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage |
Tom Hosiawa |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:23:17 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: r3200 - main/trunk/bin |
Alec Warner |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:09:26 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage |
Brian |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 04:30:25 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] portage |
Tom Hosiawa |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 03:05:45 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: r3200 - main/trunk/bin |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 02:28:28 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] glsa implemented as a special set |
Brian |
Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:53:49 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] efficient source for changes in the portage tree |
Björn Ruberg |
Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:35:48 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] efficient source for changes in the portage tree |
Brian |
Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:12:45 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] efficient source for changes in the portage tree |
Björn Ruberg |
Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:32:49 |
Portage Features That Depend on Binaries [WAS: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? ] |
Alec Warner |
Thu, 20 Apr 2006 03:28:18 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Philipp Riegger |
Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:52:58 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] accessing portage updates through it's data structures |
Tom Hosiawa |
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:45:43 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] accessing portage updates through it's data structures |
Tom Hosiawa |
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:18:12 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] accessing portage updates through it's data structures |
Tom Hosiawa |
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:06:28 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] accessing portage updates through it's data structures |
Jason Stubbs |
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:58:58 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] accessing portage updates through it's data structures |
Tom Hosiawa |
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 04:20:26 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Outstanding decisions |
Alec Warner |
Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:53:00 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Outstanding decisions |
Simon Stelling |
Sun, 16 Apr 2006 22:15:46 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Outstanding decisions |
Alec Warner |
Sun, 16 Apr 2006 18:30:55 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Outstanding decisions |
Mike Frysinger |
Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:51:05 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: generating ._cfg0000_foo multiple times between --sync |
Michiel de Bruijne |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 23:44:38 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: generating ._cfg0000_foo multiple times between --sync |
Duncan |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 16:51:39 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Duncan |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 16:15:46 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] Outstanding decisions |
Simon Stelling |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:51:29 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] generating ._cfg0000_foo multiple times between --sync |
Michiel de Bruijne |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:08:09 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Philipp Riegger |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:12:37 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Zac Medico |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 07:12:34 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Duncan |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 06:40:49 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Brian Harring |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 02:35:53 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Jason Stubbs |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 02:08:45 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Jason Stubbs |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 01:56:57 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Jason Stubbs |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 01:56:10 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Brian Harring |
Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:32:00 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Alec Warner |
Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:10:51 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Brian Harring |
Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:22:28 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Philipp Riegger |
Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:16:06 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? |
Jason Stubbs |
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:45:52 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? |
Zac Medico |
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:36:09 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? |
Zac Medico |
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:29:19 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:41:17 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Jason Stubbs |
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:12:28 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? |
Ned Ludd |
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:08:59 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? |
Duncan |
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:05:33 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? |
Simon Stelling |
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:54:10 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? |
Zac Medico |
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:25:13 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] intrusive spring cleaning/sanitizing |
Brian Harring |
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:53:10 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] spring cleaning. |
Brian Harring |
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:51:27 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] spring cleaning. |
Mark Pagano |
Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:40:45 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node |
Brian |
Sun, 09 Apr 2006 19:33:49 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node |
Zac Medico |
Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:42:38 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node |
Brian |
Sun, 09 Apr 2006 17:41:14 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node |
Zac Medico |
Sun, 09 Apr 2006 17:27:25 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] intrusive spring cleaning/sanitizing |
Brian Harring |
Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:27:41 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] spring cleaning. |
Brian Harring |
Sun, 09 Apr 2006 12:20:54 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node |
Simon Stelling |
Sun, 09 Apr 2006 11:08:45 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node |
Donnie Berkholz |
Sun, 09 Apr 2006 10:43:30 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] portage management node |
Eldad Zack |
Sun, 09 Apr 2006 09:43:10 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Ned Ludd |
Sat, 08 Apr 2006 12:49:29 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Ned Ludd |
Sat, 08 Apr 2006 12:47:36 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Donnie Berkholz |
Sat, 08 Apr 2006 07:39:42 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Jason Stubbs |
Sat, 08 Apr 2006 02:18:46 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Zac Medico |
Sat, 08 Apr 2006 01:39:32 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Ned Ludd |
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 22:36:10 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 21:54:01 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
solar |
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 18:20:04 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Alec Warner |
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:26:47 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Jason Stubbs |
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 12:06:38 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Ned Ludd |
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 11:54:18 |
Re: [Fwd: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon?] |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 06:52:34 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 06:37:02 |
[Fwd: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon?] |
Alec Warner |
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 05:09:32 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Brian Harring |
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 05:01:50 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Marius Mauch |
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 03:12:49 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 02:12:05 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Marius Mauch |
Thu, 06 Apr 2006 23:01:12 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? |
Zac Medico |
Thu, 06 Apr 2006 20:14:17 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] rewriting the ldconfig logic |
Zac Medico |
Wed, 05 Apr 2006 01:24:43 |
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Repoman Help Extraction |
Marius Mauch |
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:34:56 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] Repoman Help Extraction |
Alec Warner |
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 01:13:52 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] Pychecker |
Alec Warner |
Mon, 03 Apr 2006 06:04:24 |