Subject |
From |
Date |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] boost-utils.eclass -- for building against newest boost. |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 21:41:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item 1: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile) |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 20:15:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item 2: updates to catalyst |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 20:15:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item 1: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile) |
Aaron W. Swenson |
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:58:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] boost-utils.eclass -- for building against newest boost. |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:10:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] boost-utils.eclass -- for building against newest boost. |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 17:49:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] boost-utils.eclass -- for building against newest boost. |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 08:06:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] boost-utils.eclass -- for building against newest boost. |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 05:28:17 |
[gentoo-dev] Perl: please don't delete packlists |
Matthias Bethke |
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 03:55:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Matt Turner |
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 03:34:44 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: News item 1: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile) |
Duncan |
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:58:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] python-distutils-ng.eclass: allow useflag dependencies for python |
Michał Górny |
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:36:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] making USE=upnp a global flag |
Michał Górny |
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:30:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item 1: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile) |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:07:16 |
[gentoo-dev] making USE=upnp a global flag |
Mike Frysinger |
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 17:39:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] python-distutils-ng.eclass: allow useflag dependencies for python |
hasufell |
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:07:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michael Orlitzky |
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:04:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] doheader function for EAPI 5? |
Sergey Popov |
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 12:17:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michał Górny |
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:27:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 06:47:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Patrick Lauer |
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 00:58:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] On flags being in IUSE (and the prefix USE-flag in particular) |
Gregory M. Turner |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 23:40:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michael Orlitzky |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 22:56:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROOT, EROOT, and EPREFIX in scripts |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:11:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROOT, EROOT, and EPREFIX in scripts (was: relative ROOT: correct behavior when ROOT=) |
Gregory M. Turner |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:52:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:43:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:29:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:19:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:18:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:16:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:12:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:11:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:08:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Alexis Ballier |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:03:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sub-slots (for EAPI 5) |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:56:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sub-slots (for EAPI 5) |
Fabian Groffen |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:52:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:43:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sub-slots (for EAPI 5) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:39:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:29:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sub-slots (for EAPI 5) |
Fabian Groffen |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:26:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:21:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:16:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:12:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sub-slots (for EAPI 5) |
Fabian Groffen |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:09:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sub-slots (for EAPI 5) |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:05:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sub-slots (for EAPI 5) |
Fabian Groffen |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:03:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sub-slots (for EAPI 5) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:00:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:56:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sub-slots (for EAPI 5) |
Fabian Groffen |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:52:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:47:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sub-slots (for EAPI 5) |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:42:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:38:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] On flags being in IUSE (and the prefix USE-flag in particular) |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:34:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:30:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:28:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sub-slots (for EAPI 5) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:28:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:27:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:23:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:20:18 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: sub-slots (for EAPI 5) |
Fabian Groffen |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:19:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-portage-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue |
Fabian Groffen |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:02:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:02:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-portage-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:56:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-portage-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:55:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:47:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Alexis Ballier |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:46:26 |
[gentoo-dev] On flags being in IUSE (and the prefix USE-flag in particular) |
Fabian Groffen |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:36:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:35:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-portage-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue |
Fabian Groffen |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:14:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:04:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:01:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:55:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:50:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:45:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:42:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:37:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michael Mol |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:32:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:18:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:18:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:18:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:06:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Alexis Ballier |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:50:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Wulf C. Krueger |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:27:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:16:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:11:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:04:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:02:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:57:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:52:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:23:27 |
[gentoo-dev] Use slot deps for all gstreamer package dependencies (including plugins); preparation for gstreamer-1.0 |
Mart Raudsepp |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 13:54:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:39:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:30:22 |
[gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:52:04 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: python-distutils-ng.eclass: allow useflag dependencies for python |
Jonathan Callen |
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 23:09:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] python-distutils-ng.eclass: allow useflag dependencies for python |
Brian Harring |
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 21:28:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI usage |
Brian Harring |
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 21:07:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] python-distutils-ng.eclass: allow useflag dependencies for python |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 20:59:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: python-distutils-ng.eclass - add a convenience variable for use deps |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 20:56:28 |
[gentoo-dev] python-distutils-ng.eclass: allow useflag dependencies for python |
hasufell |
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 20:46:52 |