Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Early idea: install_qa_check() refactor and 'public API' |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 06:36:49 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Deprecating and killing the concept of herds |
Duncan |
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 02:07:49 |
[gentoo-dev] Early idea: install_qa_check() refactor and 'public API' |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:20:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Deprecating and killing the concept of herds |
Markos Chandras |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:21:51 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-compat |
Ulrich Mueller |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:59:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Deprecating and killing the concept of herds |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:28:25 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
Steven J. Long |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:03:01 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Deprecating and killing the concept of herds |
Steven J. Long |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:33:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
hasufell |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:09:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:59:24 |
Re: OT - My last one to this thread - Skype + Tox - Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-needed@ packages need you! |
Andrew Savchenko |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:43:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Deprecating and killing the concept of herds |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:19:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Deprecating and killing the concept of herds |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:02:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
hasufell |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:56:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:52:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Deprecating and killing the concept of herds |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:53:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Deprecating and killing the concept of herds |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:37:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Deprecating and killing the concept of herds |
Pacho Ramos |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:33:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: trimming the @system set [was: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set] |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:13:09 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: trimming the @system set [was: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set] |
Duncan |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:36:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: trimming the @system set [was: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set] |
J. Roeleveld |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 08:08:54 |
OT - My last one to this thread - Skype + Tox - Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-needed@ packages need you! |
J. Roeleveld |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 05:50:02 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: systemd profiles |
Steven J. Long |
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 03:00:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Deprecating and killing the concept of herds |
Kent Fredric |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 22:54:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Deprecating and killing the concept of herds |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 22:23:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Deprecating and killing the concept of herds |
Anthony G. Basile |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 20:44:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Deprecating and killing the concept of herds |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 19:56:08 |
[gentoo-dev] RFC: Deprecating and killing the concept of herds |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 19:46:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
hasufell |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 19:12:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
Jauhien Piatlicki |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 19:03:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 19:01:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
hasufell |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:37:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:33:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:28:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:16:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
hasufell |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:58:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:45:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
hasufell |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:41:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
Samuli Suominen |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:23:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-needed@ packages need you! |
Andrew Savchenko |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:00:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] tox |
Alexander Berntsen |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 06:51:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
hasufell |
Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:49:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
Patrick Lauer |
Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:00:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
hasufell |
Mon, 08 Sep 2014 14:15:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
hasufell |
Mon, 08 Sep 2014 14:13:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
Anthony G. Basile |
Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:51:21 |
[gentoo-dev] tox (was: maintainer-needed@ packages need you!) |
Martin Vaeth |
Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:48:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 08 Sep 2014 06:59:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: trimming the @system set [was: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set] |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 08 Sep 2014 06:44:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina |
Mon, 08 Sep 2014 03:47:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
Patrick Lauer |
Mon, 08 Sep 2014 02:36:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: trimming the @system set [was: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set] |
Joshua Kinard |
Mon, 08 Sep 2014 01:36:42 |
[gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git? |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 08 Sep 2014 01:03:06 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-needed@ packages need you! |
Duncan |
Sun, 07 Sep 2014 22:09:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: trimming the @system set [was: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set] |
Joshua Kinard |
Sun, 07 Sep 2014 21:58:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: trimming the @system set [was: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set] |
Rich Freeman |
Sun, 07 Sep 2014 21:04:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: trimming the @system set [was: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set] |
Joshua Kinard |
Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:55:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: trimming the @system set [was: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set] |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:45:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: trimming the @system set [was: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set] |
Joshua Kinard |
Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:34:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: trimming the @system set [was: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set] |
Rich Freeman |
Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:01:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set |
Joshua Kinard |
Sun, 07 Sep 2014 19:55:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: trimming the @system set [was: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set] |
Joshua Kinard |
Sun, 07 Sep 2014 19:50:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-needed@ packages need you! |
J. Roeleveld |
Sun, 07 Sep 2014 15:51:50 |
[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs |
Pacho Ramos |
Sun, 07 Sep 2014 13:20:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-needed@ packages need you! |
Andrew Savchenko |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 21:17:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
Anthony G. Basile |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 18:20:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 18:15:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
Anthony G. Basile |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 18:08:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 17:10:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
Anthony G. Basile |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:57:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
hasufell |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:23:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:18:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
Anthony G. Basile |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:16:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
hasufell |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:13:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
Anthony G. Basile |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:04:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 14:04:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
hasufell |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:58:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
Anthony G. Basile |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:50:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] why does net-misc/tor enables "Log notice syslog" ? |
Toralf Förster |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:49:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set |
Rich Freeman |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:37:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set |
Rich Freeman |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:22:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set |
Anthony G. Basile |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:20:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:10:45 |
[gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 64: Export Package Manager Cached Information. (Was: RFC: GLEP 64: Standardize contents of VDB and establish and API for exporting this information.) |
Anthony G. Basile |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:01:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set |
Patrick Lauer |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 12:41:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set |
Anthony G. Basile |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 12:16:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] why does net-misc/tor enables "Log notice syslog" ? |
Anthony G. Basile |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 11:55:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set |
Rich Freeman |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 11:06:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-08-17 23h59 UTC |
Markos Chandras |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 10:57:01 |
[gentoo-dev] why does net-misc/tor enables "Log notice syslog" ? |
Toralf Förster |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 10:45:19 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: python3_2 target |
Michał Górny |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 10:27:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-08-17 23h59 UTC |
Markos Chandras |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 08:16:41 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set |
Duncan |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 07:39:45 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set |
Duncan |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 06:44:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set |
Rich Freeman |
Sat, 06 Sep 2014 00:10:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sys-apps/iproute2 to the @system set |
Anthony G. Basile |
Fri, 05 Sep 2014 23:32:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-08-17 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:42:29 |
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-08-31 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:28:37 |
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-08-24 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:27:23 |
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-08-24 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:26:53 |