| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages |
Thomas Kahle |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:00:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new `usex` helper |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:25:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] finding reverse dependencies for arch testing (and other purposes) |
Markos Chandras |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:45:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] finding reverse dependencies for arch testing (and other purposes) |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:41:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:38:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Please don't use IUSE=static-libs unless really necessary |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:13:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages |
Thomas Kahle |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:56:04 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages |
Duncan |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:52:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Please don't use IUSE=static-libs unless really necessary |
Thomas Kahle |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:39:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new `usex` helper |
Alec Warner |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:37:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] finding reverse dependencies for arch testing (and other purposes) |
Thomas Kahle |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:35:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] finding reverse dependencies for arch testing (and other purposes) |
Thomas Kahle |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:30:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:11:04 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages |
Duncan |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:59:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:47:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Pacho Ramos |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:25:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] git-2: a bunch of patches to review |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:19:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new `usex` helper |
Donnie Berkholz |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:12:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan) |
Corentin Chary |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:05:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan) |
Markos Chandras |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 11:00:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] git-2: a bunch of patches to review |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:19:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan) |
Corentin Chary |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:58:35 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Duncan |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 04:06:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages |
Patrick Lauer |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:14:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:44:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages |
Tony \"Chainsaw\" Vroon |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:33:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new `usex` helper |
Brian Harring |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:21:36 |
| [gentoo-dev] [RFC] How do we handle stabilisations of not-exactly-maintained packages |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:19:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] git-2: a bunch of patches to review |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:03:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] git-2: a bunch of patches to review |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:01:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] git-2: a bunch of patches to review |
Stratos Psomadakis |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:49:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] git-2: a bunch of patches to review |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:46:56 |
| [gentoo-dev] git-2: a bunch of patches to review |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:31:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:02:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan) |
Donnie Berkholz |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:06:06 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Alec Warner |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:49:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:15:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Patrick Lauer |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:04:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Patrick Lauer |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:01:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Zac Medico |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:29:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Zac Medico |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:20:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Pacho Ramos |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:23:54 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Duncan |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:58:44 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Ulrich Mueller |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:34:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Pacho Ramos |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:26:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Pacho Ramos |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:16:44 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:14:48 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Pacho Ramos |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:09:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:33:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Brian Harring |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:08:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:51:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:46:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Patrick Lauer |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:44:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Brian Harring |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:29:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:27:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:22:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan) |
Corentin Chary |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:00:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Alex Alexander |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 07:14:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Alex Alexander |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 06:58:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Fabian Groffen |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 06:50:24 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] obs eclasses |
Steven J Long |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 05:08:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Zac Medico |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 03:54:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Zac Medico |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:51:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Joshua Kinard |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:09:21 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Please don't use IUSE=static-libs unless really necessary |
Duncan |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:53:08 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Duncan |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:45:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Please don't use IUSE=static-libs unless really necessary |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:39:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Please don't use IUSE=static-libs unless really necessary |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:01:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:46:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:30:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants |
Joshua Kinard |
Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:26:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants |
Joshua Kinard |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:29:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Joshua Kinard |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:25:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Joshua Kinard |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:20:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:58:04 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Duncan |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:54:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Greg KH |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:41:21 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Please don't use IUSE=static-libs unless really necessary |
Duncan |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:26:35 |
| [gentoo-dev] RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem |
Alex Alexander |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:15:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Luca Barbato |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:47:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan) |
Hans de Graaff |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:25:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:02:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] finding reverse dependencies for arch testing (and other purposes) |
Markos Chandras |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:45:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Greg KH |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:37:59 |
| [gentoo-dev] finding reverse dependencies for arch testing (and other purposes) |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:31:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Please don't use IUSE=static-libs unless really necessary |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:06:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Please don't use IUSE=static-libs unless really necessary |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:37:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Please don't use IUSE=static-libs unless really necessary |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:12:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Please don't use IUSE=static-libs unless really necessary |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:56:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Please don't use IUSE=static-libs unless really necessary |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:44:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan) |
Corentin Chary |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:52:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Arun Raghavan |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:18:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Joshua Kinard |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:39:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Dale |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:31:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:09:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Joshua Kinard |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:59:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan) |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:52:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr |
Joshua Kinard |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:47:19 |
| [gentoo-dev] install-mask -- a tool for all the 'I don't want this file' complainers |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:43:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan) |
Corentin Chary |
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:40:55 |
Archives