| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Dane Smith |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:07:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:05:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] validity of manifest signing key |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:56:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:54:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:53:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:49:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] validity of manifest signing key |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:48:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] validity of manifest signing key |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:48:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:47:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:36:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:33:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] mono.eclass EAPI3(/4) |
Donnie Berkholz |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:33:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Dane Smith |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:02:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:56:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits |
Dane Smith |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:47:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] validity of manifest signing key |
Dane Smith |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:38:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:15:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] validity of manifest signing key |
Christoph Mende |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:19:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] validity of manifest signing key |
Antoni Grzymala |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:14:40 |
| [gentoo-dev] validity of manifest signing key |
Thomas Kahle |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:14:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Peter Volkov |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:13:55 |
| [gentoo-dev] validity of manifest signing key |
Thomas Kahle |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:47:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:45:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits |
Antoni Grzymala |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:15:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits |
Antoni Grzymala |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:12:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:53:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits |
Patrick Lauer |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 07:32:33 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits |
Torsten Veller |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 07:16:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:26:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Brian Harring |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:22:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:19:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Antoni Grzymala |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:10:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:52:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Jeroen Roovers |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:51:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:47:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:43:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] mono.eclass EAPI3(/4) |
Christoph Mende |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:05:01 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:51:14 |
| [gentoo-dev] mono.eclass EAPI3(/4) |
Christoph Mende |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:49:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Rémi Cardona |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:43:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Mike Gilbert |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:29:19 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:20:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Petteri Räty |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:13:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Olivier Crête |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:09:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Markos Chandras |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:05:25 |
| [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:00:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: git-2.eclass final review |
Donnie Berkholz |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:55:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: git-2.eclass final review |
James Cloos |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:55:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Eclass review: xorg-2 virtualx |
Donnie Berkholz |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:04:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: git-2.eclass final review |
Donnie Berkholz |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:29:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav |
Donnie Berkholz |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:25:39 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav |
Luca Barbato |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:30:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:19:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:12:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav |
Jeremy Olexa |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:03:00 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: git-2.eclass final review |
James Cloos |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:48:31 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav |
Samuli Suominen |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:22:57 |
| [gentoo-dev] virtual/ffmpeg and media-video/libav |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:10:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: git-2.eclass final review |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:03:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: git-2.eclass final review |
James Cloos |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:34:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] git-2.eclass final review |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:46:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: git-2.eclass final review |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:56:10 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: git-2.eclass final review |
Ryan Hill |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:40:54 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: git-2.eclass final review |
Ryan Hill |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:36:24 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: FEATURES=test, sys-devel/gcc ignored test failures |
Ryan Hill |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:20:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] git-2.eclass final review |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:09:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] git-2.eclass final review |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:40:59 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] python.eclass EAPI 4 support |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:32:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] git-2.eclass final review |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:27:25 |
| [gentoo-dev] git-2.eclass final review |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:10:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: FEATURES=test, sys-devel/gcc ignored test failures |
Matt Turner |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:02:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How to list ARCH in gentoo? |
Kfir Lavi |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:58:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How to list ARCH in gentoo? |
Tom Knight |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:05:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: RFC: Making largefile a global use |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:00:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: RFC: Making largefile a global use |
Peter Volkov |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:43:57 |
| [gentoo-dev] How to list ARCH in gentoo? |
Kfir Lavi |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:28:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: FEATURES=test, sys-devel/gcc ignored test failures |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:10:30 |
| [gentoo-dev] python.eclass EAPI 4 support |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:53:26 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: FEATURES=test, sys-devel/gcc ignored test failures |
Ryan Hill |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:58:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: emboss.eclass corrected version for review |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:13:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: emboss.eclass corrected version for review |
justin |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:02:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: emboss.eclass corrected version for review |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:35:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] pax-utils.eclass: elog -> einfo? |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:17:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How a new ARCH is added to Gentoo? |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:15:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: emboss.eclass as replacement for embassy.eclass |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:22:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: emboss.eclass as replacement for embassy.eclass |
Fabian Groffen |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:15:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: emboss.eclass as replacement for embassy.eclass |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:05:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] FEATURES=test, sys-devel/gcc ignored test failures |
Amadeusz Żołnowski |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:30:50 |
| [gentoo-dev] How a new ARCH is added to Gentoo? |
Kfir Lavi |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:29:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] pax-utils.eclass: elog -> einfo? |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:27:24 |
| [gentoo-dev] FEATURES=test, sys-devel/gcc ignored test failures |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:08:43 |
| [gentoo-dev] RFC: emboss.eclass corrected version for review |
justin |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:59:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: emboss.eclass as replacement for embassy.eclass |
justin |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:38:42 |
| [gentoo-dev] masking mailwrapper |
Eray Aslan |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:00:02 |
| [gentoo-dev] euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan) |
Corentin Chary |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:24:42 |
| [gentoo-dev] Save dev-util/plan9port ! |
Andy Spencer |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 07:51:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs |
Jeroen Roovers |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:42:25 |
| [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2011-03-20 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:25:53 |
| [gentoo-dev] multilib profile changes wrt symlink lib |
Mike Frysinger |
Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:28:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: emboss.eclass as replacement for embassy.eclass |
Mike Frysinger |
Sun, 20 Mar 2011 18:40:16 |
Archives