Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev in May 2009

Subject From Date
Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category? Theo Chatzimichos Tue, 26 May 2009 15:48:24
Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category? AllenJB Tue, 26 May 2009 15:29:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLSA-2, a new DTD for GLSAs Robert Buchholz Tue, 26 May 2009 15:21:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category? Fabian Groffen Tue, 26 May 2009 15:17:35
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLSA-2, a new DTD for GLSAs Pierre-Yves Rofes Tue, 26 May 2009 15:14:27
Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category? Federico Ferri Tue, 26 May 2009 14:51:22
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLSA-2, a new DTD for GLSAs Tiziano Müller Tue, 26 May 2009 14:49:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category? Philipp Riegger Tue, 26 May 2009 14:35:43
Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category? Tiziano Müller Tue, 26 May 2009 14:24:12
[gentoo-dev] RFC: GLSA-2, a new DTD for GLSAs Robert Buchholz Tue, 26 May 2009 14:19:57
[gentoo-dev] Re: The fallacies of GLEP55 Steven J Long Tue, 26 May 2009 14:10:22
[gentoo-dev] Re: The fallacies of GLEP55 Steven J Long Tue, 26 May 2009 14:02:56
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-analyzer/ns and net-analyzer/nam Federico Ferri Tue, 26 May 2009 13:42:14
[gentoo-dev] Re: better support for binary packages Duncan Tue, 26 May 2009 13:30:18
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 26 May 2009 13:20:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: better support for binary packages Philipp Riegger Tue, 26 May 2009 11:00:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: better support for binary packages Philipp Riegger Tue, 26 May 2009 10:41:51
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: better support for binary packages lxnay@××××××××××××.org Tue, 26 May 2009 09:23:24
[gentoo-dev] Re: better support for binary packages Duncan Tue, 26 May 2009 08:50:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support lxnay@××××××××××××.org Tue, 26 May 2009 08:10:00
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-geosciences/osm2mp Hanno Böck Tue, 26 May 2009 08:05:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] better support for binary packages Kobboi Tue, 26 May 2009 07:30:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: better support for binary packages Philipp Riegger Tue, 26 May 2009 07:05:18
[gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category? Ulrich Mueller Tue, 26 May 2009 07:04:49
Re: [gentoo-dev] Regarding Gentoo CDs and accessibility sizes Petteri Räty Tue, 26 May 2009 05:29:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] Regarding Gentoo CDs and accessibility sizes Andrew Gaffney Tue, 26 May 2009 01:53:18
[gentoo-dev] Regarding Gentoo CDs and accessibility sizes Keith Hinton Tue, 26 May 2009 00:44:42
[gentoo-dev] Re: better support for binary packages Duncan Mon, 25 May 2009 22:31:20
Gentoo Security Project Summary -- was Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries Robert Buchholz Mon, 25 May 2009 21:20:27
[gentoo-dev] New feature for python eclass for review Petteri Räty Mon, 25 May 2009 20:49:35
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support Robert Buchholz Mon, 25 May 2009 20:32:55
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support Ben de Groot Mon, 25 May 2009 20:24:38
Re: [gentoo-dev] better support for binary packages Ben de Groot Mon, 25 May 2009 20:20:31
[gentoo-dev] Re: Baselayout 2 stabilisation todo Christian Faulhammer Mon, 25 May 2009 20:13:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout 2 stabilisation todo Roy Marples Mon, 25 May 2009 19:45:32
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support Josh Saddler Mon, 25 May 2009 19:21:25
Re: [gentoo-dev] better support for binary packages lxnay@××××××××××××.org Mon, 25 May 2009 18:47:30
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support Robert Buchholz Mon, 25 May 2009 18:37:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout 2 stabilisation todo Robert Buchholz Mon, 25 May 2009 18:03:48
Re: [gentoo-dev] better support for binary packages Ben de Groot Mon, 25 May 2009 17:20:03
[gentoo-dev] Re: Baselayout 2 stabilisation todo Christian Faulhammer Mon, 25 May 2009 16:47:34
Re: [gentoo-dev] better support for binary packages lxnay@××××××××××××.org Mon, 25 May 2009 15:57:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support Dale Mon, 25 May 2009 15:52:22
Re: [gentoo-dev] better support for binary packages Ben de Groot Mon, 25 May 2009 15:47:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support AllenJB Mon, 25 May 2009 15:36:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support lxnay@××××××××××××.org Mon, 25 May 2009 15:24:26
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media Maciej Mrozowski Mon, 25 May 2009 14:27:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support Alex Legler Mon, 25 May 2009 13:43:08
Re: [gentoo-dev] better support for binary packages lxnay@××××××××××××.org Mon, 25 May 2009 10:12:15
[gentoo-dev] better support for binary packages Philipp Riegger Mon, 25 May 2009 09:54:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media Petteri Räty Mon, 25 May 2009 06:45:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support lxnay@××××××××××××.org Mon, 25 May 2009 06:26:32
[gentoo-dev] Has anyone tried to use Linux Unified Kernel ? Branko Badrljica Mon, 25 May 2009 01:07:38
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2009-05-24 23h59 UTC Robin H. Johnson Mon, 25 May 2009 00:15:05
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Allow bash-4.0 features in EAPI="3" ebuilds Patrick Lauer Sun, 24 May 2009 21:59:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] Speech on the Gentoo Linux LiveCD William Hubbs Sun, 24 May 2009 21:23:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Allow bash-4.0 features in EAPI="3" ebuilds Ciaran McCreesh Sun, 24 May 2009 21:22:32
[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Allow bash-4.0 features in EAPI="3" ebuilds Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis Sun, 24 May 2009 21:20:37
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Allow bash-4.0 features in EAPI="3" ebuilds Patrick Lauer Sun, 24 May 2009 21:16:28
[gentoo-dev] Speech on the Gentoo Linux LiveCD Keith Hinton Sun, 24 May 2009 21:13:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: The fallacies of GLEP55 Ciaran McCreesh Sun, 24 May 2009 21:10:50
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: The fallacies of GLEP55 David Leverton Sun, 24 May 2009 20:59:06
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: The fallacies of GLEP55 Steven J Long Sun, 24 May 2009 20:55:11
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Allow bash-4.0 features in EAPI="3" ebuilds Ciaran McCreesh Sun, 24 May 2009 20:44:06
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: The fallacies of GLEP55 Steven J Long Sun, 24 May 2009 20:42:31
[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Allow bash-4.0 features in EAPI="3" ebuilds Steven J Long Sun, 24 May 2009 20:33:42
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support Tiziano Müller Sun, 24 May 2009 19:28:29
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support lxnay@××××××××××××.org Sun, 24 May 2009 18:00:22
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support Ben de Groot Sun, 24 May 2009 17:56:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media Andrew Gaffney Sun, 24 May 2009 17:35:41
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support Nirbheek Chauhan Sun, 24 May 2009 17:35:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support Ciaran McCreesh Sun, 24 May 2009 17:28:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support Nirbheek Chauhan Sun, 24 May 2009 17:20:49
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support Ciaran McCreesh Sun, 24 May 2009 17:04:06
[gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support lxnay@××××××××××××.org Sun, 24 May 2009 17:00:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media Tobias Scherbaum Sun, 24 May 2009 16:16:38
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media Dale Sun, 24 May 2009 12:00:03
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media Roy Bamford Sun, 24 May 2009 10:32:27
Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout 2 stabilisation todo Roy Marples Sun, 24 May 2009 07:28:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout 2 stabilisation todo Roy Marples Sun, 24 May 2009 07:27:41
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/glewpy and dev-python/pycrash Jesus Rivero Sun, 24 May 2009 05:20:48
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media William Hubbs Sun, 24 May 2009 03:12:35
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media Dale Sun, 24 May 2009 02:53:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media Dale Sun, 24 May 2009 02:50:41
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media William Hubbs Sun, 24 May 2009 02:22:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media Ferris McCormick Sun, 24 May 2009 02:19:01
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media William Hubbs Sun, 24 May 2009 01:44:07
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media Dale Sun, 24 May 2009 01:12:26
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media Ferris McCormick Sun, 24 May 2009 00:52:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media Dale Sun, 24 May 2009 00:32:25
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media Thomas Pani Sat, 23 May 2009 23:47:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media Andrew Gaffney Sat, 23 May 2009 23:15:00
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Accessibility on our release media Mounir Lamouri Sat, 23 May 2009 22:56:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout 2 stabilisation todo Mike Auty Sat, 23 May 2009 22:09:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout 2 stabilisation todo Roy Marples Sat, 23 May 2009 21:53:22
Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout 2 stabilisation todo Roy Marples Sat, 23 May 2009 21:51:16
[gentoo-dev] The VMware packages are in need of a maintainer Mike Auty Sat, 23 May 2009 21:27:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout 2 stabilisation todo Alin Năstac Sat, 23 May 2009 18:20:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout 2 stabilisation todo Dawid Węgliński Sat, 23 May 2009 12:39:13
Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout 2 stabilisation todo Tobias Klausmann Sat, 23 May 2009 08:53:52