Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev in July 2014

Subject From Date
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Ciaran McCreesh Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:46:25
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Pacho Ramos Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:44:55
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Martin Vaeth Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:42:06
[gentoo-dev] Call for help: app-admin/chef Manuel Rüger Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:39:15
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Martin Vaeth Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:37:04
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Anthony G. Basile Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:36:43
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Pacho Ramos Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:33:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Ian Stakenvicius Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:31:46
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Martin Vaeth Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:30:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Pacho Ramos Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:29:01
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Pacho Ramos Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:25:42
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Martin Vaeth Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:25:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Ciaran McCreesh Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:20:37
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Martin Vaeth Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:16:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Ciaran McCreesh Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:07:27
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Martin Vaeth Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:01:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Ciaran McCreesh Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:00:36
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Ulrich Mueller Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:56:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Andreas K. Huettel Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:55:58
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Martin Vaeth Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:55:18
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Andreas K. Huettel Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:53:26
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Martin Vaeth Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:52:38
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Ciaran McCreesh Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:49:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Ciaran McCreesh Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:46:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Ciaran McCreesh Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:45:06
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Martin Vaeth Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:48
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Martin Vaeth Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:32:52
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Rich Freeman Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:23:28
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Martin Vaeth Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:20:24
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Anthony G. Basile Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:15:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Ulrich Mueller Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:08:52
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Martin Vaeth Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:01:18
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Pacho Ramos Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:00:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Manuel Rüger Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:57:49
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Pacho Ramos Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:56:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Anthony G. Basile Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:46:27
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Samuli Suominen Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:44:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Pacho Ramos Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:36:17
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Martin Vaeth Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:32:32
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Martin Vaeth Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:21:04
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Johannes Huber Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:09:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Anthony G. Basile Sat, 26 Jul 2014 10:21:13
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Duncan Sat, 26 Jul 2014 09:05:21
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Duncan Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:58:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Michał Górny Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:53:25
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Pacho Ramos Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:44:38
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Pacho Ramos Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:36:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Pacho Ramos Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:30:28
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Pacho Ramos Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:28:29
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Duncan Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:06:04
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined justin Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:17:45
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Duncan Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:15:11
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Duncan Sat, 26 Jul 2014 05:21:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Patrick Lauer Sat, 26 Jul 2014 04:36:51
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Tom Wijsman Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:10:07
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Tom Wijsman Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:00:03
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Ciaran McCreesh Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:50:31
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined William Hubbs Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:46:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Ciaran McCreesh Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:26:11
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Ciaran McCreesh Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:25:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined William Hubbs Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:23:34
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Ian Stakenvicius Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:13:32
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Ian Stakenvicius Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:09:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Michał Górny Fri, 25 Jul 2014 20:41:43
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Ciaran McCreesh Fri, 25 Jul 2014 20:18:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Pacho Ramos Fri, 25 Jul 2014 20:13:03
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status William Hubbs Fri, 25 Jul 2014 20:07:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Anthony G. Basile Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:56:08
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Ian Stakenvicius Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:55:07
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Pacho Ramos Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:51:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Pacho Ramos Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:50:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Ian Stakenvicius Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:50:08
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Ciaran McCreesh Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:47:00
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Luis Ressel Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:44:13
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Anthony G. Basile Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:37:38
[gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Pacho Ramos Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:28:48
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Ian Stakenvicius Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:24:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Luis Ressel Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:04:57
[gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Ian Stakenvicius Fri, 25 Jul 2014 18:50:00
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Rich Freeman Fri, 25 Jul 2014 18:26:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Ian Stakenvicius Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:39:51
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Ian Stakenvicius Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:36:33
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Andreas K. Huettel Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:18:14
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Alexander Berntsen Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:53:24
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps hasufell Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:45:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Ciaran McCreesh Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:27:08
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps hasufell Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:24:13
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Ciaran McCreesh Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:15:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps hasufell Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:10:07
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Ciaran McCreesh Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:01:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Ian Stakenvicius Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:59:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="gudev introspection" removal from virtual/udev tomorrow'ish Ian Stakenvicius Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:59:24
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Ian Stakenvicius Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:44:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="gudev introspection" removal from virtual/udev tomorrow'ish Samuli Suominen Fri, 25 Jul 2014 09:39:03
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Pacho Ramos Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:53:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Pacho Ramos Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:52:05
[gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Duncan Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:39:25
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Pacho Ramos Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:36:44
Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="gudev introspection" removal from virtual/udev tomorrow'ish Daniel Campbell Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:07:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Michał Górny Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:34:29