Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Greg KH |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:45:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions |
Rich Freeman |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:42:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Rich Freeman |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:21:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:13:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Michael Mol |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:07:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:04:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:54:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Rich Freeman |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:53:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Mart Raudsepp |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:35:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Michael Orlitzky |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:46:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Rich Freeman |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:21:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Rich Freeman |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:13:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions |
Rich Freeman |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:07:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Roy Bamford |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:02:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Mart Raudsepp |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:01:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Mart Raudsepp |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:44:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Mart Raudsepp |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:27:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:19:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions |
Ulrich Mueller |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:00:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:22:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions |
Ulrich Mueller |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:55:34 |
[gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:01:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Gordon Pettey |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 03:44:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Rich Freeman |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 03:15:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Walter Dnes |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 02:54:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 02:05:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Peter Stuge |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:23:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
waltdnes@××××××××.org |
Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:20:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Peter Stuge |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 23:21:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Robin H. Johnson |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:25:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:01:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Denis Dupeyron |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:16:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Peter Stuge |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:35:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Peter Stuge |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:09:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Tom H |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:56:08 |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake-utils.eclass: Fix multi-arg CC/CXX/FC, #542530 |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:51:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:05:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Francesco Riosa |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:02:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:11:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Raymond Jennings |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:23:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:04:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Joshua Kinard |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:50:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:58:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:02:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Kent Fredric |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 01:59:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Kent Fredric |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 01:39:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
M. J. Everitt |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 01:19:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Benda Xu |
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:40:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item |
Joakim Tjernlund |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 22:45:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Matthias Maier |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 22:41:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:52:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:12:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Francesco Riosa |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:56:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:09:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:07:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item |
Joakim Tjernlund |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:03:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:42:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:32:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item |
Joakim Tjernlund |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:09:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:11:57 |
[gentoo-dev] LLVM News item |
Joakim Tjernlund |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:33:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
William Hubbs |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:27:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Mike Gilbert |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:19:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
William Hubbs |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:16:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:15:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Mike Gilbert |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:13:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:11:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Mike Gilbert |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:10:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
James Le Cuirot |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:08:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:06:05 |
[gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update |
William Hubbs |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:01:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:50:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:27:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:24:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:18:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Ulrich Mueller |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:54:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Mike Gilbert |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:47:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] need for autotools |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:41:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] need for autotools |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:35:43 |
[gentoo-dev] need for autotools (was: Commented packages in the @system set) |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:34:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Alexis Ballier |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:17:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Nick Vinson |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:06:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Alexis Ballier |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:16:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:15:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Raymond Jennings |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:12:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:04:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Alexis Ballier |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:01:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Alexis Ballier |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:56:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:17:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Ulrich Mueller |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:55:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:16:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:50:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:37:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:26:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:26:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Daniel Campbell |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 04:49:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:12:14 |
[gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set |
Michael Orlitzky |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:44:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Matthias Maier |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:49:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Matt Turner |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:48:54 |