Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev in October 2016

Subject From Date
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Greg KH Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:45:27
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions Rich Freeman Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:42:32
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Rich Freeman Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:21:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions Michał Górny Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:13:34
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Michael Mol Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:07:32
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Michał Górny Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:04:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Ian Stakenvicius Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:54:42
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Rich Freeman Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:53:44
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Mart Raudsepp Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:35:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Michael Orlitzky Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:46:41
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Rich Freeman Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:21:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Rich Freeman Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:13:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions Rich Freeman Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:07:28
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Roy Bamford Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:02:24
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Mart Raudsepp Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:01:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Mart Raudsepp Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:44:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Mart Raudsepp Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:27:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions Michał Górny Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:19:13
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions Ulrich Mueller Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:00:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions Michał Górny Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:22:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions Ulrich Mueller Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:55:34
[gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions Michał Górny Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:01:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Gordon Pettey Thu, 27 Oct 2016 03:44:03
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Rich Freeman Thu, 27 Oct 2016 03:15:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Walter Dnes Thu, 27 Oct 2016 02:54:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Ian Stakenvicius Thu, 27 Oct 2016 02:05:27
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Peter Stuge Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:23:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set waltdnes@××××××××.org Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:20:08
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Peter Stuge Wed, 26 Oct 2016 23:21:42
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Robin H. Johnson Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:25:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Rich Freeman Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:01:32
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Denis Dupeyron Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:16:33
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Peter Stuge Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:35:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Peter Stuge Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:09:30
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Tom H Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:56:08
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake-utils.eclass: Fix multi-arg CC/CXX/FC, #542530 Michał Górny Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:51:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Ian Stakenvicius Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:05:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Francesco Riosa Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:02:41
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item Ian Stakenvicius Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:11:05
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Raymond Jennings Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:23:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Michał Górny Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:04:51
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Joshua Kinard Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:50:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Kristian Fiskerstrand Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:58:41
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Rich Freeman Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:02:38
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Kent Fredric Wed, 26 Oct 2016 01:59:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Kent Fredric Wed, 26 Oct 2016 01:39:48
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update M. J. Everitt Wed, 26 Oct 2016 01:19:00
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Benda Xu Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:40:29
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item Joakim Tjernlund Tue, 25 Oct 2016 22:45:48
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Matthias Maier Tue, 25 Oct 2016 22:41:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Ian Stakenvicius Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:52:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Michał Górny Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:12:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Francesco Riosa Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:56:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item Michał Górny Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:09:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item Ian Stakenvicius Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:07:13
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item Joakim Tjernlund Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:03:34
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item Ian Stakenvicius Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:42:01
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item Ian Stakenvicius Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:32:43
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item Joakim Tjernlund Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:09:05
Re: [gentoo-dev] LLVM News item Michał Górny Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:11:57
[gentoo-dev] LLVM News item Joakim Tjernlund Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:33:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update William Hubbs Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:27:52
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Mike Gilbert Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:19:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update William Hubbs Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:16:11
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Ian Stakenvicius Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:15:22
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Mike Gilbert Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:13:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Ian Stakenvicius Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:11:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Mike Gilbert Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:10:49
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update James Le Cuirot Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:08:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update Rich Freeman Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:06:05
[gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update William Hubbs Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:01:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Michał Górny Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:50:09
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Rich Freeman Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:27:42
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Rich Freeman Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:24:01
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Rich Freeman Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:18:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Ulrich Mueller Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:54:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Mike Gilbert Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:47:35
Re: [gentoo-dev] need for autotools Kristian Fiskerstrand Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:41:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] need for autotools Ian Stakenvicius Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:35:43
[gentoo-dev] need for autotools (was: Commented packages in the @system set) Ian Stakenvicius Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:34:44
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Alexis Ballier Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:17:22
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Nick Vinson Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:06:11
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Alexis Ballier Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:16:52
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Rich Freeman Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:15:18
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Raymond Jennings Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:12:42
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Kristian Fiskerstrand Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:04:00
Re: [gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Alexis Ballier Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:01:51
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Alexis Ballier Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:56:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Rich Freeman Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:17:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Ulrich Mueller Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:55:10
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Rich Freeman Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:16:37
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Paweł Hajdan, Jr. Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:50:18
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Rich Freeman Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:37:44
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Kristian Fiskerstrand Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:26:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Ulrich Mueller Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:26:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Daniel Campbell Tue, 25 Oct 2016 04:49:08
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Rich Freeman Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:12:14
[gentoo-dev] Commented packages in the @system set Michael Orlitzky Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:44:00
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Matthias Maier Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:49:36
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Matt Turner Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:48:54