Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev in October 2016

Subject From Date
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Rich Freeman Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:48:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Rich Freeman Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:44:07
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? William L. Thomson Jr. Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:35:51
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Gordon Pettey Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:32:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Matt Turner Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:32:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Rich Freeman Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:28:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Rich Freeman Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:27:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? William L. Thomson Jr. Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:25:35
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Matthias Maier Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:22:09
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Rich Freeman Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:21:31
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Rich Freeman Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:19:00
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Matt Turner Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:12:50
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Matt Turner Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:10:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Rich Freeman Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:07:49
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Rich Freeman Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:03:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions William L. Thomson Jr. Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:52:43
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Ciaran McCreesh Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:40:36
[gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? Matt Turner Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:34:44
[gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions Matt Turner Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:30:01
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Rich Freeman Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:46:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Kristian Fiskerstrand Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:31:48
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Daniel Campbell (zlg) Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:21:31
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Kent Fredric Mon, 24 Oct 2016 06:38:29
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Michał Górny Mon, 24 Oct 2016 06:30:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Daniel Campbell Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:32:45
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2016-10-23 23:59 UTC Robin H. Johnson Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:05:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Daniel Campbell Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:47:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Rich Freeman Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:33:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Ulrich Mueller Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:47:18
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Greg KH Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:48:03
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] toolchain-funcs.eclass: Add tc-check-openmp() function David Seifert Sat, 22 Oct 2016 09:30:26
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Pacho Ramos Sat, 22 Oct 2016 07:59:05
Re: [gentoo-dev] x11-misc/bumblebee and x11-misc/virtualgl up for grabs Pacho Ramos Sat, 22 Oct 2016 07:54:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] grub-2 configuration Tom H Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:03:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] grub-2 configuration Robin H. Johnson Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:35:46
[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 85 bugs Alex Alexander Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:58:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] grub-2 configuration Joakim Tjernlund Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:44:11
Re: [gentoo-dev] grub-2 configuration Tom H Wed, 19 Oct 2016 19:22:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] Local workarounds with no reported bugs Raymond Jennings Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:08:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] Mentor request Paweł Hajdan, Jr. Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:15:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Rich Freeman Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:19:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Kent Fredric Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:33:10
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Matt Turner Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:31:30
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Matthew Thode Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:23:30
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Kristian Fiskerstrand Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:15:29
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Matthew Thode Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:13:25
Re: [gentoo-dev] x11-misc/bumblebee and x11-misc/virtualgl up for grabs Kent Fredric Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:58:09
Re: [gentoo-dev] x11-misc/bumblebee and x11-misc/virtualgl up for grabs Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:45:14
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Ulrich Mueller Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:10:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Alexis Ballier Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:23:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Matthew Thode Wed, 19 Oct 2016 06:43:25
Re: [gentoo-dev] Local workarounds with no reported bugs Daniel Campbell Wed, 19 Oct 2016 06:11:48
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Robin H. Johnson Wed, 19 Oct 2016 06:00:56
[gentoo-dev] Mentor request Kevin Simmons Wed, 19 Oct 2016 05:14:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Kent Fredric Wed, 19 Oct 2016 03:18:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Matthew Thode Wed, 19 Oct 2016 02:45:22
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Michael Orlitzky Wed, 19 Oct 2016 02:04:37
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Benda Xu Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:04:11
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Peter Stuge Tue, 18 Oct 2016 23:12:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Local workarounds with no reported bugs Michał Górny Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:50:39
[gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way Patrice Clement Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:13:38
Re: [gentoo-dev] x11-misc/bumblebee and x11-misc/virtualgl up for grabs NP-Hardass Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:10:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: games-strategy/freeorion NP-Hardass Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:09:34
[gentoo-dev] x11-misc/bumblebee and x11-misc/virtualgl up for grabs Pacho Ramos Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:32:19
[gentoo-dev] Re: Local workarounds with no reported bugs Patrick Lauer Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:10:01
Re: [gentoo-dev] grub-2 configuration Joakim Tjernlund Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:21:11
Re: [gentoo-dev] grub-2 configuration Tom H Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:45:49
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:15:41
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata: add vcs tag Gilles Dartiguelongue Tue, 18 Oct 2016 07:25:51
[gentoo-dev] Re: Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Duncan Tue, 18 Oct 2016 05:37:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds William L. Thomson Jr. Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:43:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Michał Górny Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:34:36
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds William L. Thomson Jr. Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:03:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Brian Evans Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:42:10
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Michał Górny Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:35:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Kent Fredric Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:25:38
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Michael Mol Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:10:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds NP-Hardass Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:51:25
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds William L. Thomson Jr. Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:18:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Michael Orlitzky Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:10:41
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Ulrich Mueller Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:09:33
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Michał Górny Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:08:55
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds William L. Thomson Jr. Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:49:05
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Kent Fredric Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:19:30
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds William L. Thomson Jr. Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:11:03
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Michał Górny Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:09:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Kent Fredric Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:03:27
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Ian Stakenvicius Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:01:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Mike Gilbert Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:00:38
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Michael Mol Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:54:55
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds William L. Thomson Jr. Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:34:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] Local workarounds with no reported bugs William L. Thomson Jr. Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:16:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds M. J. Everitt Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:13:42
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds M. J. Everitt Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:11:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Kristian Fiskerstrand Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:09:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds William L. Thomson Jr. Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:05:26
Re: [gentoo-dev] Local workarounds with no reported bugs Ian Stakenvicius Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:04:48
Re: [gentoo-dev] Local workarounds with no reported bugs Raymond Jennings Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:03:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds William L. Thomson Jr. Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:56:42
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds Kristian Fiskerstrand Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:53:10