Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:48:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:44:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:35:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Gordon Pettey |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:32:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Matt Turner |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:32:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:28:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:27:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:25:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Matthias Maier |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:22:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:21:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:19:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Matt Turner |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:12:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Matt Turner |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:10:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:07:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:03:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:52:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:40:36 |
[gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus? |
Matt Turner |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:34:44 |
[gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions |
Matt Turner |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:30:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:46:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:31:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Daniel Campbell (zlg) |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:21:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Kent Fredric |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 06:38:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 06:30:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Daniel Campbell |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:32:45 |
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2016-10-23 23:59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:05:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Daniel Campbell |
Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:47:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Rich Freeman |
Sat, 22 Oct 2016 18:33:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:47:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Greg KH |
Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:48:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] toolchain-funcs.eclass: Add tc-check-openmp() function |
David Seifert |
Sat, 22 Oct 2016 09:30:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Pacho Ramos |
Sat, 22 Oct 2016 07:59:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] x11-misc/bumblebee and x11-misc/virtualgl up for grabs |
Pacho Ramos |
Sat, 22 Oct 2016 07:54:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] grub-2 configuration |
Tom H |
Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:03:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] grub-2 configuration |
Robin H. Johnson |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:35:46 |
[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 85 bugs |
Alex Alexander |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:58:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] grub-2 configuration |
Joakim Tjernlund |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:44:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] grub-2 configuration |
Tom H |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 19:22:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Local workarounds with no reported bugs |
Raymond Jennings |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:08:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Mentor request |
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:15:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:19:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Kent Fredric |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:33:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Matt Turner |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:31:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Matthew Thode |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:23:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:15:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Matthew Thode |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:13:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] x11-misc/bumblebee and x11-misc/virtualgl up for grabs |
Kent Fredric |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:58:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] x11-misc/bumblebee and x11-misc/virtualgl up for grabs |
Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:45:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Ulrich Mueller |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:10:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Alexis Ballier |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 08:23:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Matthew Thode |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 06:43:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Local workarounds with no reported bugs |
Daniel Campbell |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 06:11:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Robin H. Johnson |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 06:00:56 |
[gentoo-dev] Mentor request |
Kevin Simmons |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 05:14:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Kent Fredric |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 03:18:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Matthew Thode |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 02:45:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Michael Orlitzky |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 02:04:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Benda Xu |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:04:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Peter Stuge |
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 23:12:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Local workarounds with no reported bugs |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:50:39 |
[gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way |
Patrice Clement |
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:13:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] x11-misc/bumblebee and x11-misc/virtualgl up for grabs |
NP-Hardass |
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:10:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: games-strategy/freeorion |
NP-Hardass |
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:09:34 |
[gentoo-dev] x11-misc/bumblebee and x11-misc/virtualgl up for grabs |
Pacho Ramos |
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:32:19 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Local workarounds with no reported bugs |
Patrick Lauer |
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:10:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] grub-2 configuration |
Joakim Tjernlund |
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:21:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] grub-2 configuration |
Tom H |
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:45:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:15:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata: add vcs tag |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 07:25:51 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Duncan |
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 05:37:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:43:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:34:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:03:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Brian Evans |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:42:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:35:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Kent Fredric |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:25:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Michael Mol |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:10:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
NP-Hardass |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:51:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:18:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Michael Orlitzky |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:10:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:09:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:08:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:49:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Kent Fredric |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:19:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:11:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:09:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Kent Fredric |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:03:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:01:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Mike Gilbert |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:00:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Michael Mol |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:54:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:34:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Local workarounds with no reported bugs |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:16:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
M. J. Everitt |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:13:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
M. J. Everitt |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:11:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:09:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:05:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Local workarounds with no reported bugs |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:04:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Local workarounds with no reported bugs |
Raymond Jennings |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:03:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:56:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:53:10 |