Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer |
Encoding could not be reliably detected. Contents not available. |
Sun, 17 Jun 2007 13:23:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer |
Konstantin V. Arkhipov |
Sun, 17 Jun 2007 13:20:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer |
Tobias Scherbaum |
Sun, 17 Jun 2007 13:05:37 |
[gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer |
Konstantin V. Arkhipov |
Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:46:58 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-java/javahelp-bin |
Petteri Räty |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:53:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Richard Freeman |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:26:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-1 (or >1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies |
John R. Graham |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:21:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Jean-Marc Hengen |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:19:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Josh Sled |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:49:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Vlastimil Babka |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:06:11 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Innovation in Open-Source Communities |
Christian Faulhammer |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:42:11 |
[gentoo-dev] Innovation in Open-Source Communities |
Christopher Bach |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:29:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-1 (or >1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:04:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-1 (or >1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies |
Luca Barbato |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:45:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Jan Kundrát |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:21:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-1 (or >1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies |
John R. Graham |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:14:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-1 (or >1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies |
Vlastimil Babka |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:57:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-1 (or >1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies |
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:35:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-1 (or >1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies |
Tobias Klausmann |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:08:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-1 (or >1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies |
Kent Fredric |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:31:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-1 (or >1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies |
Vlastimil Babka |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 04:55:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Abhay Kedia |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 04:33:51 |
[gentoo-dev] EAPI-1 (or >1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies |
John R. Graham |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:30:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Doug Goldstein |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:48:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Abhay Kedia |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:14:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Luca Barbato |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:48:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are you guys for real? |
Wernfried Haas |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:46:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping closed source pkgs (Was: Re: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree) |
Philip Webb |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:14:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are you guys for real? |
Christian Parpart |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:27:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Are you guys for real? |
Christian Parpart |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:22:26 |
[gentoo-dev] Keeping closed source pkgs (Was: Re: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree) |
Steve Long |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:16:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are you guys for real? |
Jan Kundrat |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:27:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are you guys for real? |
Dawid Węgliński |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:01:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are you guys for real? |
Kent Fredric |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:17:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Kent Fredric |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:04:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are you guys for real? |
Preston Cody |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:16:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Abhay Kedia |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:27:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are you guys for real? |
Peter Weller |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:12:56 |
[gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:04:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are you guys for real? |
Peter Weller |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:59:54 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Are you guys for real? |
Markus Ullmann |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:58:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are you guys for real? |
Hélder Máximo Botter Ribas |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:48:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are you guys for real? |
Vlastimil Babka |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:45:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are you guys for real? |
Mike Owen |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:37:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are you guys for real? |
Raúl Porcel |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:36:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Are you guys for real? |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:27:26 |
[gentoo-dev] Are you guys for real? |
Jayson Vaughn |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:20:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Vlastimil Babka |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:47:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Kent Fredric |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:39:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Vlastimil Babka |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:31:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Luca Barbato |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:12:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Abhay Kedia |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:02:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:45:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Vlastimil Babka |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:32:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Petteri Räty |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:30:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
George Shapovalov |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:57:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:56:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Daniel Gryniewicz |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:53:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Vlastimil Babka |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:44:20 |
[gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree |
Gustavo Felisberto |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:39:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree |
Brian Harring |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:01:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree |
banym tuxaner |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:49:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree |
Robert Buchholz |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:38:32 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-java/sablevm |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:17:31 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Do not modify ebuilds which are already in the tree... even if masked |
Steve Long |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:57:37 |
Re: OT: gentoo-kindergarten (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML) |
Kent Fredric |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:13:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Stephen P. Becker |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:01:31 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: OT: gentoo-kindergarten |
Vlastimil Babka |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:54:04 |
OT: gentoo-kindergarten (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML) |
Thilo Bangert |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:47:04 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Steve Long |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:28:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Kumba |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:10:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:55:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: How to help an ebuild move along |
Flammie Pirinen |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:07:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Ferris McCormick |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:04:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:12:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Stephen P. Becker |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:06:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:57:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Joshua Jackson |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:56:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:53:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Benjamin Judas |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:48:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Benjamin Judas |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:45:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Stephen Bennett |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:30:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Stephen P. Becker |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:26:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Benjamin Judas |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:16:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Benjamin Judas |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:13:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Alexander Færøy |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:04:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Stephen Bennett |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:35:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML |
Wernfried Haas |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:04:20 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree |
Duncan |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:59:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree |
Luis Francisco Araujo |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:13:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree |
cilly |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:02:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree |
Marius Mauch |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:58:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Do not modify ebuilds which are already in the tree... even if masked |
Luca Barbato |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:40:06 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Do not modify ebuilds which are already in the tree... even if masked |
Markus Ullmann |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:39:33 |
Sorry! WAS: Re: [gentoo-dev] Do not modify ebuilds which are already in the tree... even if masked |
cilly |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:35:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Do not modify ebuilds which are already in the tree... even if masked |
Michael Cummings |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:23:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Do not modify ebuilds which are already in the tree... even if masked |
Luca Barbato |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:19:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Do not modify ebuilds which are already in the tree... even if masked |
cilly |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:18:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Do not modify ebuilds which are already in the tree... even if masked |
cilly |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:16:22 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Do not modify ebuilds which are already in the tree... even if masked |
Christian Faulhammer |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:13:22 |