Subject |
From |
Date |
[gentoo-dev] Should we allow picture files in the Portage tree? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:12:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go |
Emery Hemingway |
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:21:24 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
Michael Palimaka |
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:12:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/wmbattery: ChangeLog wmbattery-2.42.ebuild wmbattery-2.19-r1.ebuild |
Bernard Cafarelli |
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:05:35 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: gnustep-libs/cddb |
Bernard Cafarelli |
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:42:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
Александр Берсенев |
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:36:11 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Ryan Hill |
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:48:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Matt Turner |
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:23:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 23:57:05 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-plugins/desklet-sudoku |
Dion Moult |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 23:54:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Chris Reffett |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:47:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/wmbattery: ChangeLog wmbattery-2.42.ebuild wmbattery-2.19-r1.ebuild |
Samuli Suominen |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:15:26 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
Michael Palimaka |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:46:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:14:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/wmbattery: ChangeLog wmbattery-2.42.ebuild wmbattery-2.19-r1.ebuild |
Bernard Cafarelli |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:58:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:14:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:11:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:11:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:10:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Lars Wendler |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:29:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Pacho Ramos |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:24:05 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Ryan Hill |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 06:27:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
Brian Dolbec |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 06:01:08 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Ryan Hill |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 05:08:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Chris Reffett |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:33:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Ulrich Mueller |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:20:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/wmbattery: ChangeLog wmbattery-2.42.ebuild wmbattery-2.19-r1.ebuild |
Samuli Suominen |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:04:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Samuli Suominen |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:02:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Ulrich Mueller |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:51:21 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/wmbattery: ChangeLog wmbattery-2.42.ebuild wmbattery-2.19-r1.ebuild |
Bernard Cafarelli |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:20:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:14:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
Jason A. Donenfeld |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:13:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Samuli Suominen |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:05:50 |
[gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) |
Alex Alexander |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:39:27 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/htmlview |
Dion Moult |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:59:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
Wulf C. Krueger |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:40:01 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
Michael Palimaka |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:36:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:03:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
justin |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:49:27 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
Michael Palimaka |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:39:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:34:10 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/wmbattery: ChangeLog wmbattery-2.42.ebuild wmbattery-2.19-r1.ebuild |
Samuli Suominen |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:10:59 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
Michael Palimaka |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:56:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
Michael Haubenwallner |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:29:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go |
yac |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:54:12 |
[gentoo-dev] mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
Jason A. Donenfeld |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:36:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 and git |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:20:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 and git |
Alec Warner |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:12:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 and git |
yac |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:02:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 and git |
Alec Warner |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:05:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Alan McKinnon |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:26:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 and git |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:17:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Alec Warner |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:57:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 and git |
Alec Warner |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:53:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Lars Wendler |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:04:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:47:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Tom Wijsman |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:20:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Tom Wijsman |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:09:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Alan McKinnon |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:26:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:17:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:05:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:42:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Anthony G. Basile |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:33:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:31:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Tom Wijsman |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:58:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Tom Wijsman |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:53:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:41:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Tom Wijsman |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:36:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:25:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Tom Wijsman |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:24:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:07:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Patrick Lauer |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:43:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Patrick Lauer |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:40:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:34:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:25:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Anthony G. Basile |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:23:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Tom Wijsman |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:22:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:04:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 and git |
Tom Wijsman |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:56:28 |
[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules |
Patrick Lauer |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:39:55 |
[gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 and git |
Patrick Lauer |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:29:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Thank you |
Encoding could not be reliably detected. Contents not available. |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:33:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug #494552: libnotify |
Samuli Suominen |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:49:00 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: rox-extra/comicthumb |
Dion Moult |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 02:56:02 |
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-02-09 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:25:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug #494552: libnotify |
Tom Wijsman |
Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:56:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Thank you |
Rich Freeman |
Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:46:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Thank you |
Richard Yao |
Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:23:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Thank you |
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina |
Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:07:06 |
[gentoo-dev] Bug #494552: libnotify |
Elias Diem |
Sun, 09 Feb 2014 15:28:25 |
[gentoo-dev] waf-utils.eclass: maintainer needed |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Sun, 09 Feb 2014 12:27:10 |
[gentoo-dev] sawfish/rep-gtk/librep up for grabs |
Pacho Ramos |
Sun, 09 Feb 2014 10:38:25 |
[gentoo-dev] gpg key transition |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:40:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Thank you |
Denis Dupeyron |
Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:01:46 |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] gnome2-utils.eclass: Fix SELinux labeling issue in gnome2_gdk_pixbuf_update() |
Luis Ressel |
Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:22:53 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: dropping redundant stable keywords |
Duncan |
Thu, 06 Feb 2014 19:51:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: dropping redundant stable keywords |
William Hubbs |
Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:26:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag called "qrcode" for QR code support |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Thu, 06 Feb 2014 15:21:10 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: dropping redundant stable keywords |
Duncan |
Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:40:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs |
Bernard Cafarelli |
Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:28:59 |