| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Robin H. Johnson |
Sat, 31 May 2014 23:01:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Robin H. Johnson |
Sat, 31 May 2014 22:53:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Tom Wijsman |
Sat, 31 May 2014 22:21:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Fabio Erculiani |
Sat, 31 May 2014 21:43:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Samuli Suominen |
Sat, 31 May 2014 20:18:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Robin H. Johnson |
Sat, 31 May 2014 20:06:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Robin H. Johnson |
Sat, 31 May 2014 20:00:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Fabio Erculiani |
Sat, 31 May 2014 19:51:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Samuli Suominen |
Sat, 31 May 2014 19:48:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Robin H. Johnson |
Sat, 31 May 2014 19:42:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Removing src_test from www-client/chromium |
Tom Wijsman |
Sat, 31 May 2014 18:31:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Removing src_test from www-client/chromium |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Sat, 31 May 2014 17:50:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release -> No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore |
Samuli Suominen |
Sat, 31 May 2014 11:19:46 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Removing src_test from www-client/chromium |
Ryan Hill |
Sat, 31 May 2014 03:38:42 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release -> No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore |
Steven J. Long |
Sat, 31 May 2014 02:25:09 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Steven J. Long |
Sat, 31 May 2014 02:17:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
hasufell |
Sat, 31 May 2014 01:09:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
Peter Stuge |
Sat, 31 May 2014 00:50:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs |
Markos Chandras |
Fri, 30 May 2014 22:08:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Alexander Tsoy |
Fri, 30 May 2014 20:19:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Fri, 30 May 2014 19:47:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
hasufell |
Fri, 30 May 2014 19:20:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Sven Vermeulen |
Fri, 30 May 2014 18:30:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 30 May 2014 18:29:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 30 May 2014 18:16:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Ben Kohler |
Fri, 30 May 2014 18:08:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 30 May 2014 18:04:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 30 May 2014 18:00:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina |
Fri, 30 May 2014 17:56:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Fabio Erculiani |
Fri, 30 May 2014 17:40:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 30 May 2014 17:33:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 30 May 2014 17:23:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Alexander Berntsen |
Fri, 30 May 2014 17:21:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 30 May 2014 17:21:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 30 May 2014 17:19:48 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 30 May 2014 17:18:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 30 May 2014 17:16:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Alexander Berntsen |
Fri, 30 May 2014 17:14:48 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 30 May 2014 17:14:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 30 May 2014 17:13:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 30 May 2014 17:12:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Ben Kohler |
Fri, 30 May 2014 17:02:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 30 May 2014 16:51:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Alexander Tsoy |
Fri, 30 May 2014 16:51:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina |
Fri, 30 May 2014 16:48:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Alexander Berntsen |
Fri, 30 May 2014 16:43:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
hasufell |
Fri, 30 May 2014 16:34:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Samuli Suominen |
Fri, 30 May 2014 16:28:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Samuli Suominen |
Fri, 30 May 2014 16:19:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 30 May 2014 16:11:19 |
| [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? |
Samuli Suominen |
Fri, 30 May 2014 15:12:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 30 May 2014 14:06:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
Anthony G. Basile |
Fri, 30 May 2014 12:00:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
Jeroen Roovers |
Fri, 30 May 2014 10:18:54 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
Duncan |
Fri, 30 May 2014 06:45:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 30 May 2014 03:22:03 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
Duncan |
Fri, 30 May 2014 02:21:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
Peter Stuge |
Thu, 29 May 2014 17:45:55 |
| [gentoo-dev] Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
Anthony G. Basile |
Thu, 29 May 2014 17:39:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Removing src_test from www-client/chromium |
Tom Wijsman |
Thu, 29 May 2014 10:47:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Removing src_test from www-client/chromium |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Thu, 29 May 2014 09:10:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Wed, 28 May 2014 20:33:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs |
Markos Chandras |
Wed, 28 May 2014 20:28:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Removing src_test from www-client/chromium |
Jeroen Roovers |
Tue, 27 May 2014 14:48:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Removing src_test from www-client/chromium |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Tue, 27 May 2014 14:10:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release -> No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore |
Alexey Shvetsov |
Tue, 27 May 2014 08:19:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release -> No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore |
Alexey Shvetsov |
Tue, 27 May 2014 08:19:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Removing src_test from www-client/chromium |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 27 May 2014 08:06:18 |
| [gentoo-dev] RFC: Removing src_test from www-client/chromium |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Tue, 27 May 2014 07:02:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release -> No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore |
Samuli Suominen |
Tue, 27 May 2014 06:58:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release -> No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 27 May 2014 05:35:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release -> No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 27 May 2014 05:35:17 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release -> No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore |
Samuli Suominen |
Mon, 26 May 2014 20:23:27 |
| [gentoo-dev] UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release -> No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore |
Samuli Suominen |
Mon, 26 May 2014 20:17:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH python-utils-r1] Move python_fix_shebang to python-utils-r1 and rewrite it clean. |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 26 May 2014 16:14:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] packages masked for removal in 30 days |
Sergey Popov |
Mon, 26 May 2014 11:29:36 |
| [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-05-25 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 26 May 2014 00:25:11 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of the as-is (so-called) license |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 25 May 2014 14:41:10 |
| [gentoo-dev] RFC: Prefix compatibility for gx86's sys-apps/util-linux |
Greg Turner |
Sun, 25 May 2014 01:54:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Continuous repoman using travis-ci |
Tom Wijsman |
Sat, 24 May 2014 16:01:06 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] packages masked for removal in 30 days |
Brian Dolbec |
Sat, 24 May 2014 15:22:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] packages masked for removal in 30 days |
grozin@g.o |
Sat, 24 May 2014 15:07:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Continuous repoman using travis-ci |
hasufell |
Sat, 24 May 2014 14:03:32 |
| [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs |
Pacho Ramos |
Sat, 24 May 2014 07:45:44 |
| [gentoo-dev] Continuous repoman using travis-ci |
Manuel Rüger |
Fri, 23 May 2014 21:47:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] packages masked for removal in 30 days |
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina |
Fri, 23 May 2014 19:51:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] packages masked for removal in 30 days |
Rémi Cardona |
Fri, 23 May 2014 19:42:33 |
| [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-biology/ncbi-tools++ |
Manuel Rüger |
Fri, 23 May 2014 17:36:17 |
| [gentoo-dev] packages masked for removal in 30 days |
grozin@g.o |
Fri, 23 May 2014 15:57:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] multilib-build.eclass: getting 'long' ABI value & deprecating multilib_for_best_abi() |
Bertrand Jacquin |
Fri, 23 May 2014 08:49:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] multilib-build.eclass: getting 'long' ABI value & deprecating multilib_for_best_abi() |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 23 May 2014 07:55:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH python-utils-r1] Move python_fix_shebang to python-utils-r1 and rewrite it clean. |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 20 May 2014 21:16:46 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH python-utils-r1] Move python_fix_shebang to python-utils-r1 and rewrite it clean. |
Mike Gilbert |
Tue, 20 May 2014 18:27:11 |
| [gentoo-dev] [PATCH python-utils-r1] Move python_fix_shebang to python-utils-r1 and rewrite it clean. |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 20 May 2014 18:20:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of the as-is (so-called) license |
hasufell |
Mon, 19 May 2014 18:58:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update to elisp-common.eclass |
Alex Xu |
Mon, 19 May 2014 11:18:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update to elisp-common.eclass |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 19 May 2014 11:17:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update to elisp-common.eclass |
Alex Xu |
Mon, 19 May 2014 10:29:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of the as-is (so-called) license |
Alexander Berntsen |
Mon, 19 May 2014 09:09:13 |
| [gentoo-dev] Removal of the as-is (so-called) license |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 19 May 2014 08:57:29 |
Archives