Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] multilib amd64 news item for review |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 14:44:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] multilib amd64 news item for review |
Alex Xu |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 14:14:31 |
[gentoo-dev] multilib amd64 news item for review |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 14:12:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Rich Freeman |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:40:52 |
[gentoo-dev] Multilib going live for stable amd64 on 2015-03-29 |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:21:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] find -delete safe to use? |
James Le Cuirot |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 12:20:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Johannes Huber |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 11:07:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 11:05:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] find -delete safe to use? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:42:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Kent Fredric |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:34:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:21:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] find -delete safe to use? |
James Le Cuirot |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:15:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:48:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:45:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] find -delete safe to use? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:25:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:19:56 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-video/mplayer2 media-video/smplayer2 |
Ben de Groot |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:15:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 08:55:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 06:07:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Marc Schiffbauer |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 03:22:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] find -delete safe to use? |
Mike Frysinger |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 03:14:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Matt Turner |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 02:40:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Peter Stuge |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 02:21:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Brian Dolbec |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 02:20:24 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles/base: package.use.mask |
Ben de Groot |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 02:17:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Rich Freeman |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 02:14:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Ben de Groot |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 02:05:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Peter Stuge |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 01:55:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Jason A. Donenfeld |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 01:44:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Peter Stuge |
Sun, 15 Mar 2015 00:56:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Manuel Rüger |
Sat, 14 Mar 2015 23:30:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] find -delete safe to use? |
James Le Cuirot |
Sat, 14 Mar 2015 23:21:18 |
[gentoo-dev] find -delete safe to use? |
James Le Cuirot |
Sat, 14 Mar 2015 23:15:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:44:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Kent Fredric |
Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:42:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:39:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Rich Freeman |
Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:37:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:35:02 |
[gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted |
Robin H. Johnson |
Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:26:20 |
[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs |
Manuel Rüger |
Sat, 14 Mar 2015 20:43:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Document policy of not relying on implicit eclass inherits] |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Fri, 13 Mar 2015 21:25:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Document policy of not relying on implicit eclass inherits] |
Jeroen Roovers |
Fri, 13 Mar 2015 20:09:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version? |
Jeroen Roovers |
Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:54:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [warning] the bug queue has 89 bugs |
Jeroen Roovers |
Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:51:01 |
[gentoo-dev] ALLARCHES bugzilla keyword for stabilization requests |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:35:54 |
[gentoo-dev] Security Auditing Services from the Gentoo Security Project |
Jason A. Donenfeld |
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:01:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version? |
Markos Chandras |
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 20:58:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should there be a preference with qt4 and qt5 USE flags? |
Jason A. Donenfeld |
Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:23:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gitolite with WebHooks: testers wanted |
Rafael Goncalves Martins |
Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:35:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should there be a preference with qt4 and qt5 USE flags? |
Ben de Groot |
Mon, 09 Mar 2015 07:44:14 |
[gentoo-dev] Gitolite with WebHooks: testers wanted |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 09 Mar 2015 06:09:11 |
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-03-08 23:59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:05:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should there be a preference with qt4 and qt5 USE flags? |
Johannes Huber |
Sun, 08 Mar 2015 20:19:05 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Should there be a preference with qt4 and qt5 USE flags? |
Nikos Chantziaras |
Sun, 08 Mar 2015 19:50:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should there be a preference with qt4 and qt5 USE flags? |
Alexandre Rostovtsev |
Sun, 08 Mar 2015 19:36:06 |
[gentoo-dev] Should there be a preference with qt4 and qt5 USE flags? |
Nikos Chantziaras |
Sun, 08 Mar 2015 19:31:56 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: various ruby19-only packages |
Hans de Graaff |
Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:27:06 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-libs/openmm |
Christoph Junghans |
Sun, 08 Mar 2015 00:05:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version? |
Jeroen Roovers |
Sat, 07 Mar 2015 11:08:03 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/jackson-mapper |
James Le Cuirot |
Fri, 06 Mar 2015 23:04:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version? |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:27:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version? |
Sven Vermeulen |
Fri, 06 Mar 2015 18:14:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version? |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:55:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:06:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version? |
Jeroen Roovers |
Fri, 06 Mar 2015 10:19:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version? |
Jeroen Roovers |
Fri, 06 Mar 2015 10:10:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version? |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 06 Mar 2015 06:24:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version? |
Kent Fredric |
Thu, 05 Mar 2015 20:35:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version? |
Michael Orlitzky |
Thu, 05 Mar 2015 20:20:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version? |
Michael Orlitzky |
Thu, 05 Mar 2015 20:04:07 |
[gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version? |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Thu, 05 Mar 2015 19:02:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Service relaunch: archives.gentoo.org |
heroxbd@g.o |
Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:48:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] The bindist USE flag and RESTRICT=bindist |
Mike Gilbert |
Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:23:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fonts project meeting and elections |
Alexis Ballier |
Wed, 04 Mar 2015 14:28:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fonts project meeting and elections |
Ben de Groot |
Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:51:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] The bindist USE flag and RESTRICT=bindist |
Ulrich Mueller |
Wed, 04 Mar 2015 09:56:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Service relaunch: gitweb.gentoo.org; anon git:// moving soon |
Markos Chandras |
Wed, 04 Mar 2015 09:12:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] The bindist USE flag and RESTRICT=bindist |
Alexis Ballier |
Wed, 04 Mar 2015 09:10:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] do we need special elog messages for bindist? |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Wed, 04 Mar 2015 08:15:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] The bindist USE flag and RESTRICT=bindist |
Ulrich Mueller |
Wed, 04 Mar 2015 07:25:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] The bindist USE flag and RESTRICT=bindist |
Robin H. Johnson |
Wed, 04 Mar 2015 01:06:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Service relaunch: gitweb.gentoo.org; anon git:// moving soon |
Robin H. Johnson |
Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:57:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] The bindist USE flag and RESTRICT=bindist |
Mike Gilbert |
Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:12:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] The bindist USE flag and RESTRICT=bindist |
Mike Gilbert |
Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:10:19 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Service relaunch: gitweb.gentoo.org; anon git:// moving soon |
Markos Chandras |
Tue, 03 Mar 2015 21:57:56 |
[gentoo-dev] The bindist USE flag and RESTRICT=bindist |
Ulrich Mueller |
Tue, 03 Mar 2015 21:12:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] berlios -> sourceforge move |
Bernard Cafarelli |
Tue, 03 Mar 2015 15:42:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Service relaunch: gitweb.gentoo.org; anon git:// moving soon |
Justin (jlec) |
Tue, 03 Mar 2015 07:54:33 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Service relaunch: gitweb.gentoo.org; anon git:// moving soon |
Justin (jlec) |
Tue, 03 Mar 2015 07:42:12 |
[gentoo-dev] arm64 Mar 2nd update |
Tom Gall |
Mon, 02 Mar 2015 23:14:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 update |
Tom Gall |
Mon, 02 Mar 2015 22:09:30 |
[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 102 bugs |
Alex Alexander |
Mon, 02 Mar 2015 21:54:37 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-libs/libmsn, net-im/pebrot, net-im/msnlib, net-im/pymsn-t |
Manuel Rüger |
Mon, 02 Mar 2015 19:13:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] Rendering the official Gentoo logo / Blender 2.04, Python 2.2 |
Sebastian Pipping |
Mon, 02 Mar 2015 17:05:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why gcc-config is a separate utility, not a module for eselect? |
vivo75@×××××.com |
Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:58:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-02-22 23:59 UTC |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:31:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 update |
Yixun Lan |
Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:50:47 |
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-03-01 23:59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:05:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fonts project meeting and elections |
Peter Stuge |
Sun, 01 Mar 2015 22:44:12 |
[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 82 bugs |
Alex Alexander |
Sun, 01 Mar 2015 21:54:39 |