Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev in February 2007

Subject From Date
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Mike Doty Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:14:02
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Ciaran McCreesh Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:09:52
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Mike Doty Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:01:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] removal of winex/winex-cvs ? Mike Frysinger Wed, 21 Feb 2007 02:25:26
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Stephen Bennett Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:00:12
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Ciaran McCreesh Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:36:46
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Daniel Robbins Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:24:54
[gentoo-dev] removal of winex/winex-cvs ? Hanno Böck Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:06:23
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:01:12
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Denis Dupeyron Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:49:52
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:27:21
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Chris Gianelloni Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:00:51
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:42:08
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Daniel Robbins Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:14:59
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:54:12
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/mozilla[-bin] Raúl Porcel Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:32:08
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Daniel Robbins Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:22:00
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:35:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Daniel Robbins Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:34:38
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Brian Harring Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:25:09
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Danny van Dyk Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:11:28
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Brian Harring Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:36:52
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:23:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Daniel Robbins Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:16:20
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Stephen Bennett Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:10:09
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Bryan Østergaard Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:05:27
Re: [gentoo-dev] let's clear things up (was Slacker archs) Daniel Gryniewicz Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:57:41
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Roy Marples Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:56:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:42:59
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:37:13
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:26:09
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Brian Harring Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:16:50
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Brian Harring Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:12:55
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:59:21
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:56:45
EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Brian Harring Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:28:06
[gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs) Steve Long Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:16:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] app-admin/gkrellm + x11-plugins/gkrell* stuff needs a maintainer Jim Ramsay Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:09:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Jeroen Roovers Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:09:27
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Francesco Riosa Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:32:31
[gentoo-dev] let's clear things up (was Slacker archs) Stephen P. Becker Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:15:31
[gentoo-dev] CVS/SVN Migration, downtime Friday 23 Feb, 07h00-09h00 UTC Robin H. Johnson Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:10:33
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Bryan Østergaard Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:34:11
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Francesco Riosa Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:15:51
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Bryan Østergaard Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:45:27
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Francesco Riosa Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:49:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: reduce conflicts, separate keywording from ebuilds Luca Barbato Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:53:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Fabian Groffen Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:29:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Josh Saddler Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:03:36
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Brian Harring Tue, 20 Feb 2007 04:25:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 20 Feb 2007 03:46:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Dan Meltzer Tue, 20 Feb 2007 03:26:48
[gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:39:38
[gentoo-dev] gentoo-sources-2.4 removal Daniel Drake Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:28:21
[gentoo-dev] Package removals: net-misc/kssh, sys-fs/captive, net-print/hpoj Stefan Schweizer Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:20:31
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Simon Stelling Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:17:18
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Mike Frysinger Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:06:27
Re: [gentoo-dev] Summer of Code - worth repeating? Daniel Robbins Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:03:01
[gentoo-dev] Coda maintenance? Going once, going twice, ... Maurice van der Pot Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:03:10
Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Summer of Code 2007 Alec Warner Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:50:49
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Piotr Jaroszyński Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:42:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Mike Frysinger Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:08:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Simon Stelling Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:26:50
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Petteri Räty Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:22:55
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Simon Stelling Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:16:14
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Mike Frysinger Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:57:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Fabian Groffen Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:41:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Ciaran McCreesh Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:18:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Simon Stelling Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:18:14
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: reduce conflicts, separate keywording from ebuilds Chris Gianelloni Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:12:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Simon Stelling Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:08:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] mask and force various profile specific USE flags Chris Gianelloni Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:48:29
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Ciaran McCreesh Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:15:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Timothy Redaelli Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:08:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Mike Frysinger Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:57:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Fabian Groffen Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:32:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: reduce conflicts, separate keywording from ebuilds Andrej Kacian Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:21:22
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: reduce conflicts, separate keywording from ebuilds Mike Frysinger Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:14:02
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: reduce conflicts, separate keywording from ebuilds Stefan Schweizer Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:41:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: reduce conflicts, separate keywording from ebuilds Bryan Østergaard Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:39:34
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: reduce conflicts, separate keywording from ebuilds Bryan Østergaard Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:30:06
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: reduce conflicts, separate keywording from ebuilds Stefan Schweizer Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:25:46
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: reduce conflicts, separate keywording from ebuilds Stefan Schweizer Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:19:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Summer of Code 2007 Paul de Vrieze Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:22:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Timothy Redaelli Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:17:23
[gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass Simon Stelling Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:58:09
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: reduce conflicts, separate keywording from ebuilds Bryan Østergaard Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:37:36
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/yasuc Krzysiek Pawlik Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:20:05
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: reduce conflicts, separate keywording from ebuilds Alexander Færøy Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:09:06
[gentoo-dev] Summer of Code - worth repeating? Christel Dahlskjaer Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:06:35
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: reduce conflicts, separate keywording from ebuilds George Shapovalov Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:59:55
Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Summer of Code 2007 Christel Dahlskjaer Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:47:41
Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Summer of Code 2007 Christel Dahlskjaer Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:46:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge glitz fails (/usr/lib64/libGL.so: File wrong format) Glut also Wernfried Haas Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:07:38
[gentoo-dev] RFC: reduce conflicts, separate keywording from ebuilds Stefan Schweizer Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:58:39
[gentoo-dev] Re: Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2007-02-18 23h59 UTC Ryan Hill Mon, 19 Feb 2007 01:22:37
Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge glitz fails (/usr/lib64/libGL.so: File wrong format) Glut also Mike Frysinger Mon, 19 Feb 2007 01:08:01
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2007-02-18 23h59 UTC Robin H. Johnson Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:17:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] imagemagick-6.3.0.5 without truetype doesn't compile Stephen Bennett Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:51:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] no binaries amarok-1.4.5 ! Andrew Gaffney Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:51:26