Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev in October 2004

Subject From Date
Re: [gentoo-dev] Social Contract Change (but not to the essence :) Georgi Georgiev Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:18:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] Social Contract Change (but not to the essence :) Dylan Carlson Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:07:35
Re: [gentoo-dev] Social Contract Change (but not to the essence :) Sven Vermeulen Wed, 20 Oct 2004 06:53:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] Social Contract Change (but not to the essence :) Daniel Armyr Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:27:49
[gentoo-dev] Re: ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') Duncan Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:27:27
Re: [gentoo-dev] using one portage tree for development and portage itself Lars Weiler Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:19:06
[gentoo-dev] Re: Portage-2.0.51 STABLE TESTING Duncan Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:14:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] using one portage tree for development and portage itself Donnie Berkholz Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:44:22
[gentoo-dev] using one portage tree for development and portage itself William Hubbs Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:39:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] Installation Problem Peter Gordon Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:38:30
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') Dan Armak Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:37:20
[gentoo-dev] Installation Problem Jayesh Jose Wed, 20 Oct 2004 03:54:06
[gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.51 STABLE TESTING Nicholas Jones Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:44:05
Re: [gentoo-dev] Social Contract Change (but not to the essence :) Dylan Carlson Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:11:34
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') Duncan Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:42:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') Simone Gotti Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:13:18
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') Anthony Gorecki Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:57:52
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') Simone Gotti Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:46:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') Anthony Gorecki Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:32:55
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') Dan Armak Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:02:47
[gentoo-dev] Re: ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') Duncan Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:34:38
Re: [gentoo-dev] ooo 1.1.2 Paul de Vrieze Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:01:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] ooo 1.1.2 Thierry Carrez Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:59:38
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') Jason Rhinelander Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:59:03
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') Roman Gaufman Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:57:42
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') Chris L. Mason Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:51:11
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') Dan Armak Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:39:50
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') Roman Gaufman Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:23:13
[gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') Dan Armak Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:25:13
[gentoo-dev] ooo 1.1.2 Norberto Bensa Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:30:39
[gentoo-dev] duplicity up for grabs (removal) tigger@g.o Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:08:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] samba with ldap and a GCC question Donnie Berkholz Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:03:37
Re: [gentoo-dev] Social Contract Change (but not to the essence :) Doug Goldstein Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:52:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] samba with ldap and a GCC question Doug Goldstein Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:51:28
[gentoo-dev] Social Contract Change (but not to the essence :) Sven Vermeulen Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:47:08
[gentoo-dev] samba with ldap and a GCC question Paul Price Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:46:49
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Paul de Vrieze Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:51:42
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Paul de Vrieze Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:47:42
[gentoo-dev] finding all pkgs that dep on a cat/pkg Brian Harring Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:46:30
Re: [gentoo-dev] init script optimizations? Paul de Vrieze Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:37:22
Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size Paul de Vrieze Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:17:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Peter Ruskin Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:43:02
[gentoo-dev] Re: rsync speed and space taken Duncan Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:23:15
[gentoo-dev] Re: glibc question re bug #67166 et al Duncan Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:05:50
[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Duncan Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:49:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenSource and Business Dylan Carlson Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:49:37
Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenSource and Business Greg Aumann Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:01:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenSource and Business Kurt Lieber Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:02:24
[gentoo-dev] OpenSource and Business Cory Visi Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:52:08
[gentoo-dev] Re: rsync speed and space taken Ben XO Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:41:10
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Peter Ruskin Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:26:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of the OpenAFS ebuilds Anthony Gorecki Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:20:50
Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of the OpenAFS ebuilds Hardave Riar Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:17:31
Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of the OpenAFS ebuilds Mike Frysinger Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:06:12
[gentoo-dev] Status of the OpenAFS ebuilds Anthony Gorecki Mon, 18 Oct 2004 23:58:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Kurt Lieber Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:51:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Chris Gianelloni Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:45:48
Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild optional dependencies question Jason Rhinelander Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:38:31
Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild optional dependencies question Ciaran McCreesh Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:20:10
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Ciaran McCreesh Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:19:33
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Peter Ruskin Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:12:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] really strange portage-2.0.51_rc9 issue Robin H. Johnson Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:26:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] really strange portage-2.0.51_rc9 issue Mike Frysinger Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:23:15
[gentoo-dev] ebuild optional dependencies question Jason Rhinelander Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:16:52
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Ciaran McCreesh Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:57:50
[gentoo-dev] really strange portage-2.0.51_rc9 issue Aron Griffis Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:55:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Peter Ruskin Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:23:36
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Ciaran McCreesh Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:34:51
[gentoo-dev] Cleaning up package.mask Sven Wegener Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:40:48
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc question re bug #67166 et al Mike Frysinger Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:24:26
[gentoo-dev] little bittorrent help Jeffrey Forman Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:20:00
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Jason Stubbs Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:39:26
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Jochen Maes Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:33:51
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Luke-Jr Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:25:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Kurt Lieber Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:20:28
Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size Wolfram Schlich Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:15:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: JoseJX Joseph Jezak Mon, 18 Oct 2004 05:36:25
Re: [gentoo-dev] Help tracking down build failure Ed Grimm Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:57:44
Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-root emerges Ed Grimm Mon, 18 Oct 2004 03:59:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc question re bug #67166 et al Andrew Gaffney Mon, 18 Oct 2004 03:30:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Ciaran McCreesh Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:05:28
Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size Philippe Trottier Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:47:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Francesco Riosa Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:39:21
[gentoo-dev] glibc question re bug #67166 et al Collins Richey Sun, 17 Oct 2004 20:41:22
[gentoo-dev] Re: bootstrap-cascade.sh fails Sven Köhler Sun, 17 Oct 2004 19:49:54
[gentoo-dev] bootstrap-cascade.sh fails Sven Köhler Sun, 17 Oct 2004 18:50:38
[gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates Ciaran McCreesh Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:27:35
[gentoo-dev] Help tracking down build failure Tavis Ormandy Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:19:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1 ready to go stable on all archs Carsten Lohrke Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:37:55
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP23 - Updates and call for further discussion Ciaran McCreesh Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:12:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1 ready to go stable on all archs Henrik Brix Andersen Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:25:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP23 - Updates and call for further discussion Jason Stubbs Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:17:07
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP23 - Updates and call for further discussion Luke-Jr Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:43:01
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: init script optimizations? Georgi Georgiev Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:27:25
[gentoo-dev] GLEP23 - Updates and call for further discussion Jason Stubbs Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:26:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1 ready to go stable on all archs Donnie Berkholz Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:24:18
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: init script optimizations? Robin H. Johnson Sun, 17 Oct 2004 02:32:35
[gentoo-dev] Re: init script optimizations? Jeff Davidson Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:50:55
Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1 ready to go stable on all archs Carsten Lohrke Sat, 16 Oct 2004 19:22:54
[gentoo-dev] Re: xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1 ready to go stable on all archs Duncan Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:09:00