Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Social Contract Change (but not to the essence :) |
Georgi Georgiev |
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:18:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Social Contract Change (but not to the essence :) |
Dylan Carlson |
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:07:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Social Contract Change (but not to the essence :) |
Sven Vermeulen |
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 06:53:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Social Contract Change (but not to the essence :) |
Daniel Armyr |
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:27:49 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') |
Duncan |
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:27:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] using one portage tree for development and portage itself |
Lars Weiler |
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:19:06 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Portage-2.0.51 STABLE TESTING |
Duncan |
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:14:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] using one portage tree for development and portage itself |
Donnie Berkholz |
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:44:22 |
[gentoo-dev] using one portage tree for development and portage itself |
William Hubbs |
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:39:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Installation Problem |
Peter Gordon |
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:38:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') |
Dan Armak |
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:37:20 |
[gentoo-dev] Installation Problem |
Jayesh Jose |
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 03:54:06 |
[gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.51 STABLE TESTING |
Nicholas Jones |
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:44:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Social Contract Change (but not to the essence :) |
Dylan Carlson |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:11:34 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') |
Duncan |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:42:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') |
Simone Gotti |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:13:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') |
Anthony Gorecki |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:57:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') |
Simone Gotti |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:46:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') |
Anthony Gorecki |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:32:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') |
Dan Armak |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:02:47 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') |
Duncan |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:34:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ooo 1.1.2 |
Paul de Vrieze |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:01:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ooo 1.1.2 |
Thierry Carrez |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:59:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') |
Jason Rhinelander |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:59:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') |
Roman Gaufman |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:57:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') |
Chris L. Mason |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:51:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') |
Dan Armak |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:39:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') |
Roman Gaufman |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:23:13 |
[gentoo-dev] ANN: broken-up kde ebuilds (aka 'emerge kmail') |
Dan Armak |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:25:13 |
[gentoo-dev] ooo 1.1.2 |
Norberto Bensa |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:30:39 |
[gentoo-dev] duplicity up for grabs (removal) |
tigger@g.o |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:08:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] samba with ldap and a GCC question |
Donnie Berkholz |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:03:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Social Contract Change (but not to the essence :) |
Doug Goldstein |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:52:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] samba with ldap and a GCC question |
Doug Goldstein |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:51:28 |
[gentoo-dev] Social Contract Change (but not to the essence :) |
Sven Vermeulen |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:47:08 |
[gentoo-dev] samba with ldap and a GCC question |
Paul Price |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:46:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Paul de Vrieze |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:51:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Paul de Vrieze |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:47:42 |
[gentoo-dev] finding all pkgs that dep on a cat/pkg |
Brian Harring |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:46:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] init script optimizations? |
Paul de Vrieze |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:37:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size |
Paul de Vrieze |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:17:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Peter Ruskin |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:43:02 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: rsync speed and space taken |
Duncan |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:23:15 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: glibc question re bug #67166 et al |
Duncan |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:05:50 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Duncan |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:49:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenSource and Business |
Dylan Carlson |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:49:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenSource and Business |
Greg Aumann |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:01:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenSource and Business |
Kurt Lieber |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:02:24 |
[gentoo-dev] OpenSource and Business |
Cory Visi |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:52:08 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: rsync speed and space taken |
Ben XO |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:41:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Peter Ruskin |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:26:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of the OpenAFS ebuilds |
Anthony Gorecki |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:20:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of the OpenAFS ebuilds |
Hardave Riar |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:17:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of the OpenAFS ebuilds |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:06:12 |
[gentoo-dev] Status of the OpenAFS ebuilds |
Anthony Gorecki |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 23:58:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Kurt Lieber |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:51:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Chris Gianelloni |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:45:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild optional dependencies question |
Jason Rhinelander |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:38:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild optional dependencies question |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:20:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:19:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Peter Ruskin |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:12:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] really strange portage-2.0.51_rc9 issue |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:26:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] really strange portage-2.0.51_rc9 issue |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:23:15 |
[gentoo-dev] ebuild optional dependencies question |
Jason Rhinelander |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:16:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:57:50 |
[gentoo-dev] really strange portage-2.0.51_rc9 issue |
Aron Griffis |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:55:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Peter Ruskin |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:23:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:34:51 |
[gentoo-dev] Cleaning up package.mask |
Sven Wegener |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:40:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc question re bug #67166 et al |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:24:26 |
[gentoo-dev] little bittorrent help |
Jeffrey Forman |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:20:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Jason Stubbs |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:39:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Jochen Maes |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:33:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Luke-Jr |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:25:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Kurt Lieber |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:20:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size |
Wolfram Schlich |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:15:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: JoseJX |
Joseph Jezak |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 05:36:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Help tracking down build failure |
Ed Grimm |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:57:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-root emerges |
Ed Grimm |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 03:59:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc question re bug #67166 et al |
Andrew Gaffney |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 03:30:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:05:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size |
Philippe Trottier |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:47:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Francesco Riosa |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:39:21 |
[gentoo-dev] glibc question re bug #67166 et al |
Collins Richey |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 20:41:22 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: bootstrap-cascade.sh fails |
Sven Köhler |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 19:49:54 |
[gentoo-dev] bootstrap-cascade.sh fails |
Sven Köhler |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 18:50:38 |
[gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) Updates |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:27:35 |
[gentoo-dev] Help tracking down build failure |
Tavis Ormandy |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:19:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1 ready to go stable on all archs |
Carsten Lohrke |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:37:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP23 - Updates and call for further discussion |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:12:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1 ready to go stable on all archs |
Henrik Brix Andersen |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:25:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP23 - Updates and call for further discussion |
Jason Stubbs |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:17:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP23 - Updates and call for further discussion |
Luke-Jr |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:43:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: init script optimizations? |
Georgi Georgiev |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:27:25 |
[gentoo-dev] GLEP23 - Updates and call for further discussion |
Jason Stubbs |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:26:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1 ready to go stable on all archs |
Donnie Berkholz |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:24:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: init script optimizations? |
Robin H. Johnson |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 02:32:35 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: init script optimizations? |
Jeff Davidson |
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:50:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1 ready to go stable on all archs |
Carsten Lohrke |
Sat, 16 Oct 2004 19:22:54 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1 ready to go stable on all archs |
Duncan |
Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:09:00 |