Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev in February 2016

Subject From Date
Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy Michał Górny Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:38:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro Rich Freeman Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:32:25
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:13:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy Denis Dupeyron Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:09:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro Ian Stakenvicius Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:07:07
Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy Michał Górny Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:33:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro James Le Cuirot Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:30:27
Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy Denis Dupeyron Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:20:37
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro Rich Freeman Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:19:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy Michał Górny Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:22:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Michał Górny Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:17:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:05:03
Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy Denis Dupeyron Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:33:41
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider brettrsears@×××××.com Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:55:00
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:45:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:41:18
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:24:58
[gentoo-dev] BOINC needs maintainer Justin Lecher (jlec) Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:20:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:06:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:06:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Ben Kohler Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:01:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:00:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:55:25
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Ben Kohler Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:47:51
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro Rich Freeman Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:46:43
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:44:42
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider M. J. Everitt Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:42:13
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:39:55
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:37:43
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Michał Górny Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:32:24
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:29:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:19:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:09:49
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Alexis Ballier Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:03:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:59:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Michał Górny Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:59:10
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:53:44
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Michał Górny Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:43:52
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Rich Freeman Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:25:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: intel-sdp-r1.eclass Michał Górny Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:20:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: intel-sdp-r1.eclass David Seifert Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:09:24
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: intel-sdp-r1.eclass Duncan Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:53:50
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Alexis Ballier Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:52:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy Michał Górny Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:43:42
[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: supervise-daemon -- a lightweight openrc daemon supervisor Duncan Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:37:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Michał Górny Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:35:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Michał Górny Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:23:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro Luca Barbato Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:25:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Patrick Lauer Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:18:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy Michael Sterrett Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:52:42
Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy Michał Górny Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:40:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: intel-sdp-r1.eclass Michał Górny Wed, 17 Feb 2016 06:47:22
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Michał Górny Wed, 17 Feb 2016 06:37:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: supervise-daemon -- a lightweight openrc daemon supervisor Daniel Campbell Wed, 17 Feb 2016 06:30:57
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: intel-sdp-r1.eclass Ryan Hill Wed, 17 Feb 2016 04:48:47
[gentoo-dev] Re: Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Duncan Wed, 17 Feb 2016 04:09:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 04:01:07
[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: supervise-daemon -- a lightweight openrc daemon supervisor Duncan Wed, 17 Feb 2016 03:50:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:55:03
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Richard Yao Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:42:39
[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro Duncan Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:20:26
Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy Daniel Campbell Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:09:29
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Uncoordinated changes Rich Freeman Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:51:55
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Brian Dolbec Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:23:07
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Alexis Ballier Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:57:11
[gentoo-dev] Re: Uncoordinated changes Ryan Hill Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:56:36
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:41:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: supervise-daemon -- a lightweight openrc daemon supervisor James Le Cuirot Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:20:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Michał Górny Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:17:03
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:16:11
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: supervise-daemon -- a lightweight openrc daemon supervisor William Hubbs Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:08:24
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:03:29
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Brian Dolbec Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:52:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Alexis Ballier Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:39:35
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Anthony G. Basile Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:27:10
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro Rich Freeman Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:18:55
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Rich Freeman Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:09:30
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Alexis Ballier Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:08:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Rich Freeman Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:05:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro Daniel Campbell Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:04:05
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Alexis Ballier Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:00:14
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Patrick Lauer Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:58:34
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Michał Górny Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:34:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro Patrick Lauer Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:33:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: supervise-daemon -- a lightweight openrc daemon supervisor James Le Cuirot Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:32:27
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Brian Dolbec Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:15:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:14:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Alexis Ballier Tue, 16 Feb 2016 19:05:34
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:55:47
[gentoo-dev] rfc: supervise-daemon -- a lightweight openrc daemon supervisor William Hubbs Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:54:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:54:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro William Hubbs Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:45:10
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider William Hubbs Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:39:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:34:37
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro Rich Freeman Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:22:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Alexis Ballier Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:13:02
[gentoo-dev] rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro William Hubbs Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:09:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider William Hubbs Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:49:30
Re: [gentoo-dev] libressl: proposing a new project and calling for help Toralf Förster Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:30:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] libressl: proposing a new project and calling for help Anthony G. Basile Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:46:55